Core i3-2348M vs Xeon X5260

Intel

Core i3-2348M

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon X5260

80 WW2007
Similar parts
·······

Core i3-2348M vs Xeon X5260 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-2348M vs Xeon X5260 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-2348M vs Xeon X5260: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-2348M

2013

Why buy it

  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 3000, while Xeon X5260 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 6 MB).
  • 540% higher power demand at 512W vs 80W.

Xeon X5260

2007

Why buy it

  • +100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB).
  • Draws 80W instead of 512W, a 432W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (1,278 vs 1,286).
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i3-2348M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-2348M better than Xeon X5260?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X5260 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i3-2348M is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i3-2348M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-2348M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i3-2348M still makes the most sense overall. Core i3-2348M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-2348M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2007). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-2348M vs Xeon X5260 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i3-2348M

The Core i3-2348M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,286 points. Launch price was $225.

Intel

Xeon X5260

The Xeon X5260 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 3.33 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,278 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Core i3-2348M is built on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i3-2348M scores 1,286 against the Xeon X5260's 1,278 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i3-2348M. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i3-2348M vs 6 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon X5260.

FeatureCore i3-2348MXeon X5260
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.3 GHz
Base Clock
2.3 GHz
3.33 GHz+45%
L3 Cache
3 MB
6 MB L2 Cache+100%
L2 Cache
512 kB
Process
32 nm-29%
45 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
1,286
1,278
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-2348M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon X5260 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i3-2348MXeon X5260
Socket
PGA988
LGA771
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
1333
Max RAM Capacity
16
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i3-2348M) / not specified (Xeon X5260). The Core i3-2348M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 3000), while the Xeon X5260 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i3-2348M rivals Core i3-2330M.

FeatureCore i3-2348MXeon X5260
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true