Core i3-2350M
VS
C-50

Core i3-2350M vs C-50

Intel

Core i3-2350M

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2011
VS
AMD

C-50

2 Cores2 Thrd9 WWMax: 1 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-2350M is positioned at rank 634 and the C-50 is on rank 777, so the Core i3-2350M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-2350M

#187
Core Ultra 9 288V
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
98%
#188
Core i7-10870H
MSRP: $417|Avg: N/A
98%
#622
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
851%
#623
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
838%
#624
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
769%
#625
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
766%
#626
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
759%
#628
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
733%
#629
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
703%
#630
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
702%
#631
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
683%
#634
Core i3-2350M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#638
Celeron Dual-Core T1400
MSRP: $80|Avg: $10
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar C-50

#765
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1144%
#766
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1128%
#767
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1035%
#768
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1030%
#769
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1021%
#771
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
986%
#772
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
945%
#773
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
944%
#774
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
918%
#777
C-50
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#790
Athlon 64 TF-20
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i3-2350M leads in gaming performance. However, the C-50 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.5% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i3-2350MC-50
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ontario (2011−2012) / 40 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i3-2350MC-50
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-2350M and C-50

Intel

Core i3-2350M

The Core i3-2350M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,276 points. Launch price was $225.

AMD

C-50

The C-50 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Ontario (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 9 Watt. Memory support: DDR3 Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 1,282 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Core i3-2350M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the C-50's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Core i3-2350M versus 1 GHz on the C-50 — a 78.8% clock advantage for the Core i3-2350M. The Core i3-2350M uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the C-50 uses Ontario (2011−2012) (40 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-2350M scores 1,276 against the C-50's 1,282 — a 0.5% lead for the C-50. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-2350M vs 0 kB on the C-50.

FeatureCore i3-2350MC-50
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.3 GHz+130%
1 GHz
Base Clock
2.3 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512K (per core)+100%
Process
32 nm-20%
40 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Ontario (2011−2012)
PassMark
1,276
1,282
Geekbench 6 Single
390
Geekbench 6 Multi
806
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-2350M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the C-50 uses FT1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. The Core i3-2350M supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i3-2350M) vs 1 (C-50). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i3-2350M) vs 4 (C-50) — the Core i3-2350M offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM65,HM67,QM67 (Core i3-2350M) and AMD BGA413 (C-50).

FeatureCore i3-2350MC-50
Socket
PGA988
FT1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB+300%
4 GB
RAM Channels
2+100%
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16+300%
4
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Core i3-2350M) / not specified (C-50). Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics 3000 (Core i3-2350M) and Radeon HD 6250 (C-50) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-2350M targets Laptop.

FeatureCore i3-2350MC-50
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 3000
Radeon HD 6250
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Laptop