Core i3-2367M vs Core 2 Duo T7100
Core i3-2367M
Core 2 Duo T7100
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-2367M is positioned at rank 148 and the Core 2 Duo T7100 is on rank 24, so the Core 2 Duo T7100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-2367M
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T7100
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i3-2367M | Core 2 Duo T7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i3-2367M | Core 2 Duo T7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-2367M and Core 2 Duo T7100
Core i3-2367M
The Core i3-2367M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,827 points. Launch price was $250.
Core 2 Duo T7100
The Core 2 Duo T7100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 May 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,817 points. Launch price was $197.
Processing Power
The Core i3-2367M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core 2 Duo T7100's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the Core i3-2367M versus 1.8 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T7100 — a 25% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo T7100 (base: 1.4 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Core i3-2367M uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T7100 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-2367M scores 1,827 against the Core 2 Duo T7100's 1,817 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i3-2367M. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-2367M vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo T7100.
| Feature | Core i3-2367M | Core 2 Duo T7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 1.4 GHz | 1.8 GHz+29% |
| Base Clock | 1.4 GHz | 1.8 GHz+29% |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB (total) | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 2 MB+700% |
| Process | 32 nm-51% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Merom (2006−2008) |
| PassMark | 1,827 | 1,817 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-2367M uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo T7100 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1333 on the Core i3-2367M versus DDR2-667 on the Core 2 Duo T7100 — the Core i3-2367M supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Chipset compatibility: HM65,HM67,QM67,QS57,QS67,UM67 (Core i3-2367M) and GM965,PM965 (Core 2 Duo T7100).
| Feature | Core i3-2367M | Core 2 Duo T7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1023 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | 1333+66550% | DDR2-667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Core i3-2367M) vs VT-x (Core 2 Duo T7100). The Core i3-2367M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 3000), while the Core 2 Duo T7100 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T7100 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i3-2367M rivals Core 2 Duo SU9600; Core 2 Duo T7100 rivals Athlon 64 X2 TK-42.
| Feature | Core i3-2367M | Core 2 Duo T7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 3000 | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i3-2367M and Core 2 Duo T7100
