Core i3-2367M vs Core i3-4100E

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-2367M vs Core i3-4100E FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-2367M vs Core i3-4100E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-2367M

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 17W instead of 512W, a 495W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,827 vs 1,848).

Core i3-4100E

2013

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $225 MSRP, while Core i3-2367M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌2911.8% higher power demand at 512W vs 17W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-4100E better than Core i3-2367M?

Yes. Core i3-4100E is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-4100E is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4100E is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-4100E is the better buy right now. Core i3-4100E comes in at an unclear MSRP at $225 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (8.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-4100E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-2367M vs Core i3-4100E Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-2367M

The Core i3-2367M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,827 points. Launch price was $250.

Core i3-4100E

The Core i3-4100E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 3 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,848 points. Launch price was $225.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-2367M and Core i3-4100E share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the Core i3-2367M versus 2.4 GHz on the Core i3-4100E — a 52.6% clock advantage for the Core i3-4100E (base: 1.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i3-2367M uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-4100E uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-2367M scores 1,827 against the Core i3-4100E's 1,848 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i3-4100E. Both processors carry 3 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i3-2367M	Core i3-4100E
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	1.4 GHz	2.4 GHz+71%
Base Clock	1.4 GHz	2.4 GHz+71%
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	1,827	1,848+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	550

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-2367M uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-4100E uses BGA1364 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1333 on the Core i3-2367M versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i3-4100E — the Core i3-4100E supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM65,HM67,QM67,QS57,QS67,UM67 (Core i3-2367M) and QM87,HM86,HM87 (Core i3-4100E).

Feature	Core i3-2367M	Core i3-4100E
Socket	BGA1023	BGA1364
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	1333	DDR3L-1600+20%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Core i3-2367M) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-4100E). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics 3000 (Core i3-2367M) and HD Graphics 4600 (Core i3-4100E) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4100E targets Embedded. Direct competitor: Core i3-2367M rivals Core 2 Duo SU9600; Core i3-4100E rivals Embedded R-Series.