Core i3-2310E vs Core i3-2367M

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-2310E vs Core i3-2367M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-2310E vs Core i3-2367M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-2310E

2011

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $225 MSRP, while Core i3-2367M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌105.9% higher power demand at 35W vs 17W.

Core i3-2367M

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 17W instead of 35W, a 18W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,827 vs 1,845).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-2310E better than Core i3-2367M?

Yes. Core i3-2310E is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-2310E is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-2310E is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-2310E is the better buy right now. Core i3-2310E comes in at an unclear MSRP at $225 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (8.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-2310E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-2310E vs Core i3-2367M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-2310E

The Core i3-2310E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,845 points. Launch price was $225.

Core i3-2367M

The Core i3-2367M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,827 points. Launch price was $250.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-2310E and Core i3-2367M share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.1 GHz on the Core i3-2310E versus 1.4 GHz on the Core i3-2367M — a 40% clock advantage for the Core i3-2310E (base: 2.1 GHz vs 1.4 GHz). Both are built on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture using a 32 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i3-2310E scores 1,845 against the Core i3-2367M's 1,827 — a 1% lead for the Core i3-2310E. Both processors carry 3 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i3-2310E	Core i3-2367M
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.1 GHz+50%	1.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz+50%	1.4 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,845	1,827

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the BGA1023 socket with PCIe 2.0. Both support up to 1333 memory speed. Both support up to 16 of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM65,HM67,QM67,QS67 (Core i3-2310E) and HM65,HM67,QM67,QS57,QS67,UM67 (Core i3-2367M).

Feature	Core i3-2310E	Core i3-2367M
Socket	BGA1023	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	1333	1333
Max RAM Capacity	16	16
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support true virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics 3000 (Core i3-2310E) and Intel HD Graphics 3000 (Core i3-2367M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i3-2310E rivals Core i3-2330M; Core i3-2367M rivals Core 2 Duo SU9600.