Core i3-2365M vs Core i3-2367M

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-2365M vs Core i3-2367M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-2365M vs Core i3-2367M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-2365M

2011

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,826 vs 1,827).
❌2911.8% higher power demand at 512W vs 17W.

Core i3-2367M

2011

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 17W instead of 512W, a 495W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-2367M better than Core i3-2365M?

Yes. Core i3-2367M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-2367M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-2367M still makes the most sense overall. Core i3-2367M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-2367M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-2365M vs Core i3-2367M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-2365M

The Core i3-2365M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,826 points. Launch price was $225.

Core i3-2367M

The Core i3-2367M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,827 points. Launch price was $250.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-2365M and Core i3-2367M share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the Core i3-2365M versus 1.4 GHz on the Core i3-2367M — identical boost frequencies (base: 1.4 GHz vs 1.4 GHz). Both are built on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture using a 32 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i3-2365M scores 1,826 against the Core i3-2367M's 1,827 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i3-2367M. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i3-2365M vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-2367M.

Feature	Core i3-2365M	Core i3-2367M
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	1.4 GHz	1.4 GHz
Base Clock	1.4 GHz	1.4 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB+100%	256K (per core)
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,826	1,827
Geekbench 6 Single	235	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the BGA1023 socket with PCIe 2.0. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM65,HM67,QM67,HM75,HM76,HM77 (Core i3-2365M) and HM65,HM67,QM67,QS57,QS67,UM67 (Core i3-2367M).

Feature	Core i3-2365M	Core i3-2367M
Socket	BGA1023	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	1333
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, EPT (Core i3-2365M) vs true (Core i3-2367M). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 3000 (Core i3-2365M) and Intel HD Graphics 3000 (Core i3-2367M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-2365M targets Thin & Light Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i3-2365M rivals Pentium 987; Core i3-2367M rivals Core 2 Duo SU9600.

Feature	Core i3-2365M	Core i3-2367M
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 3000	Intel HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, EPT	true
Target Use	Thin & Light Laptop	—