A8-5557M vs Core i3-2365M

A8-5557M vs Core i3-2365M Performance Spectrum

A8-5557M

4 / 4

1,831

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-2365M

2 / 4

1,826

0.0%

Pentium B950

Core i3-2310M

Pentium J3710

Celeron Dual-Core T1500

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-5557M vs Core i3-2365M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-5557M vs Core i3-2365M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-5557M

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i3-2365M

2011

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,826 vs 1,831).
❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is A8-5557M better than Core i3-2365M?

Yes. A8-5557M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A8-5557M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A8-5557M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A8-5557M still makes the most sense overall. A8-5557M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A8-5557M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A8-5557M vs Core i3-2365M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-5557M

The A8-5557M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FP2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,831 points. Launch price was $90.

Core i3-2365M

The Core i3-2365M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,826 points. Launch price was $225.

⚡

Processing Power

The A8-5557M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-2365M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A8-5557M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the A8-5557M versus 1.4 GHz on the Core i3-2365M — a 75.6% clock advantage for the A8-5557M (base: 2.1 GHz vs 1.4 GHz). The A8-5557M uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-2365M uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A8-5557M scores 1,831 against the Core i3-2365M's 1,826 — a 0.3% lead for the A8-5557M. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A8-5557M vs 3 MB on the Core i3-2365M.

Feature	A8-5557M	Core i3-2365M
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.1 GHz+121%	1.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz+50%	1.4 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+100%	512 kB
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,831	1,826
Geekbench 6 Single	—	235

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-5557M uses the FP2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-2365M uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the A8-5557M versus DDR3-1333 on the Core i3-2365M — the A8-5557M supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: FP2,FS1r2 (A8-5557M) and HM65,HM67,QM67,HM75,HM76,HM77 (Core i3-2365M).

Feature	A8-5557M	Core i3-2365M
Socket	FP2	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	1600+20%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A8-5557M) vs VT-x, EPT (Core i3-2365M). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 8510G / 8550G (A8-5557M) and HD Graphics 3000 (Core i3-2365M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-2365M targets Thin & Light Laptop. Direct competitor: A8-5557M rivals Core i3-4000M; Core i3-2365M rivals Pentium 987.

Feature	A8-5557M	Core i3-2365M
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Radeon HD 8510G / 8550G	HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	true	VT-x, EPT
Target Use	—	Thin & Light Laptop