A8-5557M vs Core i3-2377M

A8-5557M vs Core i3-2377M Performance Spectrum

A8-5557M

4 / 4

1,831

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-2377M

2 / 4

1,850

+1.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-5557M vs Core i3-2377M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-5557M vs Core i3-2377M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-5557M

2013

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,831 vs 1,850).
❌105.9% higher power demand at 35W vs 17W.

Core i3-2377M

2012

Why buy it

✅+1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 17W instead of 35W, a 18W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $250 MSRP, while A8-5557M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-2377M better than A8-5557M?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A8-5557M is ahead with a 1.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-2377M pulls ahead with 1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-2377M is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-2377M is the better buy right now. Core i3-2377M comes in at an unclear MSRP at $250 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1% better PassMark. The compromise is that A8-5557M is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 1.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (7.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A8-5557M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A8-5557M vs Core i3-2377M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-5557M

The A8-5557M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FP2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,831 points. Launch price was $90.

Core i3-2377M

The Core i3-2377M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,850 points. Launch price was $250.

⚡

Processing Power

The A8-5557M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-2377M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A8-5557M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the A8-5557M versus 1.5 GHz on the Core i3-2377M — a 69.6% clock advantage for the A8-5557M (base: 2.1 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The A8-5557M uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-2377M uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A8-5557M scores 1,831 against the Core i3-2377M's 1,850 — a 1% lead for the Core i3-2377M. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A8-5557M vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-2377M.

Feature	A8-5557M	Core i3-2377M
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.1 GHz+107%	1.5 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz+40%	1.5 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	256K (per core)+25500%
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,831	1,850+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	238
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	546

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-5557M uses the FP2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-2377M uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the A8-5557M versus DDR3-1333 on the Core i3-2377M — the A8-5557M supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: FP2,FS1r2 (A8-5557M) and FCBGA1023 (Core i3-2377M).

Feature	A8-5557M	Core i3-2377M
Socket	FP2	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	1600+20%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A8-5557M) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-2377M). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 8510G / 8550G (A8-5557M) and HD Graphics 3000 (Core i3-2377M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A8-5557M rivals Core i3-4000M.