A8-5557M vs Atom N2800
A8-5557M
Atom N2800
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A8-5557M is positioned at rank 687 and the Atom N2800 is on rank 147, so the Atom N2800 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar A8-5557M
Performance Per Dollar Atom N2800
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | A8-5557M | Atom N2800 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Cedarview-M (2011−2012) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | A8-5557M | Atom N2800 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A8-5557M and Atom N2800
A8-5557M
The A8-5557M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FP2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,831 points. Launch price was $90.
Atom N2800
The Atom N2800 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Cedarview-M (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.87 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 6.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,829 points. Launch price was $47.
Processing Power
The A8-5557M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Atom N2800 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A8-5557M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the A8-5557M versus 1.87 GHz on the Atom N2800 — a 49.5% clock advantage for the A8-5557M (base: 2.1 GHz vs 1.86 GHz). The A8-5557M uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Atom N2800 uses Cedarview-M (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A8-5557M scores 1,831 against the Atom N2800's 1,829 — a 0.1% lead for the A8-5557M. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | A8-5557M | Atom N2800 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.1 GHz+66% | 1.87 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz+13% | 1.86 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Richland (2013−2014) | Cedarview-M (2011−2012) |
| PassMark | 1,831 | 1,829 |
Memory & Platform
The A8-5557M uses the FP2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Atom N2800 uses FCBGA559 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the A8-5557M versus DDR3-1066 on the Atom N2800 — the A8-5557M supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A8-5557M supports up to 16 of RAM compared to 4 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (A8-5557M) vs 1 (Atom N2800). PCIe lanes: 16 (A8-5557M) vs 4 (Atom N2800) — the A8-5557M offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP2,FS1r2 (A8-5557M) and Intel NM10 (Atom N2800).
| Feature | A8-5557M | Atom N2800 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP2 | FCBGA559 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 1600+53233% | DDR3-1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 | 4 GB+26214300% |
| RAM Channels | 2+100% | 1 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16+300% | 4 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: true (A8-5557M) / not specified (Atom N2800). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 8510G / 8550G (A8-5557M) and Intel GMA 3650 (Atom N2800) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A8-5557M rivals Core i3-4000M.
| Feature | A8-5557M | Atom N2800 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 8510G / 8550G | Intel GMA 3650 |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | true | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on A8-5557M and Atom N2800
