A8-5557M
VS
Athlon 64 X2 6000+

A8-5557M vs Athlon 64 X2 6000+

AMD

A8-5557M

4 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2013
VS
AMD

Athlon 64 X2 6000+

2 Cores2 Thrd125 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2007

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A8-5557M is positioned at rank 687 and the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ is on rank 1077, so the A8-5557M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A8-5557M

#675
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
961%
#676
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
947%
#677
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
870%
#678
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
866%
#679
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
858%
#681
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
828%
#682
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
794%
#683
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
793%
#684
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
772%
#687
A8-5557M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#695
Processor N95
MSRP: $160|Avg: $80
98%
#699
Athlon Silver 3050e
MSRP: $100|Avg: $60
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 X2 6000+

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
76777%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
72547%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
52675%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
15869%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
12570%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
10996%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
6298%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
6216%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
5660%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
5659%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
5596%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
5445%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
5369%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
5347%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
5299%
#1077
Athlon 64 X2 6000+
MSRP: $450|Avg: $20
100%
#1078
Athlon 64 3600+
MSRP: $149|Avg: $15
98%
#1079
Core 2 Quad Q6700
MSRP: $530|Avg: $50
97%
#1080
Athlon 64 2600+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
97%
#1081
Celeron 2.20
MSRP: $79|Avg: $15
95%
#1082
Athlon 64 X2 5200+
MSRP: $420|Avg: $15
88%
#1083
Athlon 64 X2 4000+
MSRP: $328|Avg: $10
88%
#1084
Core i7-975
MSRP: $999|Avg: $50
87%
#1085
Athlon XP 2600+
MSRP: $98|Avg: $10
85%
#1086
Core i7-965
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $40
84%
#1087
Athlon 64 FX-74
MSRP: $499|Avg: $50
82%
#1088
Core 2 Extreme QX9770
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399
81%
#1089
Athlon 64 2000+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
81%
#1090
Athlon 64 X2 5600+
MSRP: $505|Avg: $15
81%
#1091
Athlon 64 X2 5400+
MSRP: $485|Avg: $78
81%
#1092
Celeron 2.30
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
80%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The A8-5557M (2013) utilizes 32 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightA8-5557MAthlon 64 X2 6000+
Gaming
Balanced gaming performance
Balanced gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Windsor (2006−2007) / 90 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Athlon 64 X2 6000+ (2007) relies on 90 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightA8-5557MAthlon 64 X2 6000+
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A8-5557M and Athlon 64 X2 6000+

AMD

A8-5557M

The A8-5557M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FP2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,831 points. Launch price was $90.

AMD

Athlon 64 X2 6000+

The Athlon 64 X2 6000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,825 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The A8-5557M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A8-5557M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the A8-5557M versus 3.1 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ — identical boost frequencies. The A8-5557M uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ uses Windsor (2006−2007) (90 nm). In PassMark, the A8-5557M scores 1,831 against the Athlon 64 X2 6000+'s 1,825 — a 0.3% lead for the A8-5557M. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureA8-5557MAthlon 64 X2 6000+
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3.1 GHz
3.1 GHz
Base Clock
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)+100%
512K
Process
32 nm-64%
90 nm
Architecture
Richland (2013−2014)
Windsor (2006−2007)
PassMark
1,831
1,825
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-5557M uses the FP2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ uses AM2 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the A8-5557M versus DDR2-800 on the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ — the A8-5557M supports 199.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A8-5557M) vs 0 (Athlon 64 X2 6000+) — the A8-5557M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP2,FS1r2 (A8-5557M) and AMD AM2 (Athlon 64 X2 6000+).

FeatureA8-5557MAthlon 64 X2 6000+
Socket
FP2
AM2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
1600+79900%
DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity
16
16 GB+104857500%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (A8-5557M) / not specified (Athlon 64 X2 6000+). The A8-5557M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8510G / 8550G), while the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A8-5557M rivals Core i3-4000M.

FeatureA8-5557MAthlon 64 X2 6000+
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 8510G / 8550G
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true