A8-5557M vs Pentium M 765

A8-5557M vs Pentium M 765 Performance Spectrum

A8-5557M

4 / 4

1,831

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium M 765

1 / 1

1,834

+0.2%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-5557M vs Pentium M 765 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-5557M vs Pentium M 765: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-5557M

2013

Why buy it

✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8510G / 8550G, while Pentium M 765 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,831 vs 1,834).
❌66.7% higher power demand at 35W vs 21W.

Pentium M 765

2004

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 21W instead of 35W, a 14W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while A8-5557M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium M 765 better than A8-5557M?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A8-5557M is ahead with a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium M 765 pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium M 765 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium M 765 still makes the most sense overall. Pentium M 765 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A8-5557M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2004). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A8-5557M vs Pentium M 765 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-5557M

The A8-5557M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FP2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,831 points. Launch price was $90.

Pentium M 765

The Pentium M 765 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,834 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The A8-5557M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium M 765 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the A8-5557M has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the A8-5557M versus 2.1 GHz on the Pentium M 765 — a 38.5% clock advantage for the A8-5557M (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The A8-5557M uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium M 765 uses Dothan (2004−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the A8-5557M scores 1,831 against the Pentium M 765's 1,834 — a 0.2% lead for the Pentium M 765. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	A8-5557M	Pentium M 765
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+300%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	3.1 GHz+48%	2.1 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB+100%
Process	32 nm-64%	90 nm
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Dothan (2004−2005)
PassMark	1,831	1,834

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-5557M uses the FP2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium M 765 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the A8-5557M versus DDR2-533 on the Pentium M 765 — the A8-5557M supports 200.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A8-5557M supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: FP2,FS1r2 (A8-5557M) and 915GM,945GT (Pentium M 765).

Feature	A8-5557M	Pentium M 765
Socket	FP2	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	1600+200%	DDR2-533
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+300%	4 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A8-5557M) vs false (Pentium M 765). The A8-5557M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8510G / 8550G), while the Pentium M 765 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A8-5557M rivals Core i3-4000M.