A8-5557M vs Celeron G3900TE

A8-5557M vs Celeron G3900TE Performance Spectrum

A8-5557M

4 / 4

1,831

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron G3900TE

2 / 2

1,850

+1.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-5557M vs Celeron G3900TE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-5557M vs Celeron G3900TE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-5557M

2013

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,831 vs 1,850).

Celeron G3900TE

2015

Why buy it

✅+1% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $42 MSRP, while A8-5557M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G3900TE better than A8-5557M?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A8-5557M is ahead with a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G3900TE pulls ahead with 1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G3900TE is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G3900TE is the better buy right now. Celeron G3900TE comes in at an unclear MSRP at $42 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1% better PassMark. The compromise is that A8-5557M is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (44.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G3900TE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A8-5557M vs Celeron G3900TE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-5557M

The A8-5557M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FP2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,831 points. Launch price was $90.

Celeron G3900TE

The Celeron G3900TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,850 points. Launch price was $42.

⚡

Processing Power

The A8-5557M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron G3900TE offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A8-5557M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the A8-5557M versus 2.3 GHz on the Celeron G3900TE — a 29.6% clock advantage for the A8-5557M. The A8-5557M uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron G3900TE uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A8-5557M scores 1,831 against the Celeron G3900TE's 1,850 — a 1% lead for the Celeron G3900TE. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A8-5557M vs 2 MB on the Celeron G3900TE.

Feature	A8-5557M	Celeron G3900TE
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.1 GHz+35%	2.3 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	2 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+100%	512 kB
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark	1,831	1,850+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	514
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	903

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-5557M uses the FP2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G3900TE uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the A8-5557M versus DDR4-2133 on the Celeron G3900TE — the Celeron G3900TE supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G3900TE supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: FP2,FS1r2 (A8-5557M) and H110,Q170 (Celeron G3900TE).

Feature	A8-5557M	Celeron G3900TE
Socket	FP2	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	1600	DDR4-2133+33%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	64 GB+300%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A8-5557M) vs VT-x, VT-d (Celeron G3900TE). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 8510G / 8550G (A8-5557M) and Intel HD Graphics 510 (Celeron G3900TE) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3900TE targets Embedded. Direct competitor: A8-5557M rivals Core i3-4000M; Celeron G3900TE rivals Pentium G4400T.