Core i3-2330E vs Core i3-2367M

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-2330E vs Core i3-2367M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-2330E vs Core i3-2367M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-2330E

2011

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,823 vs 1,827).
❌Launch MSRP is still $225 MSRP, while Core i3-2367M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌105.9% higher power demand at 35W vs 17W.

Core i3-2367M

2011

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 17W instead of 35W, a 18W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-2367M better than Core i3-2330E?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i3-2330E is ahead with 57.1% higher max boost clock. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-2367M pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-2367M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-2367M is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i3-2367M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $225 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.2% better PassMark. Core i3-2330E only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2011 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (8.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA988.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-2367M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-2330E vs Core i3-2367M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-2330E

The Core i3-2330E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,823 points. Launch price was $225.

Core i3-2367M

The Core i3-2367M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,827 points. Launch price was $250.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-2330E and Core i3-2367M share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Core i3-2330E versus 1.4 GHz on the Core i3-2367M — a 44.4% clock advantage for the Core i3-2330E (base: 2.2 GHz vs 1.4 GHz). Both are built on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture using a 32 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i3-2330E scores 1,823 against the Core i3-2367M's 1,827 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i3-2367M. Both processors carry 3 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i3-2330E	Core i3-2367M
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz+57%	1.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz+57%	1.4 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,823	1,827

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-2330E uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-2367M uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

Feature	Core i3-2330E	Core i3-2367M
Socket	PGA988	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	1333
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Core i3-2330E) vs true (Core i3-2367M). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 3000 (Core i3-2330E) and Intel HD Graphics 3000 (Core i3-2367M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-2330E targets Embedded. Direct competitor: Core i3-2367M rivals Core 2 Duo SU9600.