CPU
GPU
Athlon 64 X2 6000+
Core i3-2330E
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon 64 X2 6000+ is positioned at rank 1077 and the Core i3-2330E is on rank 1133, so the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 X2 6000+
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-2330E
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon 64 X2 6000+ | Core i3-2330E |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) | ✅ More affordable ($10) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Windsor (2006−2007) / 90 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon 64 X2 6000+ | Core i3-2330E |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+100%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) | ✅ More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 64 X2 6000+ and Core i3-2330E
Athlon 64 X2 6000+
The Athlon 64 X2 6000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,825 points. Launch price was $149.
Core i3-2330E
The Core i3-2330E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,823 points. Launch price was $225.
Processing Power
The Athlon 64 X2 6000+ packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-2330E's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ versus 2.2 GHz on the Core i3-2330E — a 34% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 X2 6000+. The Athlon 64 X2 6000+ uses the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture (90 nm), while the Core i3-2330E uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ scores 1,825 against the Core i3-2330E's 1,823 — a 0.1% lead for the Athlon 64 X2 6000+. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-2330E.
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 6000+ | Core i3-2330E |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.1 GHz+41% | 2.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | — | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 90 nm | 32 nm-64% |
| Architecture | Windsor (2006−2007) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 1,825 | 1,823 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon 64 X2 6000+ uses the AM2 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i3-2330E uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ versus DDR3-1333 on the Core i3-2330E — the Core i3-2330E supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon 64 X2 6000+) vs 16 (Core i3-2330E) — the Core i3-2330E offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 6000+ | Core i3-2330E |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM2 | PGA988 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-800 | DDR3-1333+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Athlon 64 X2 6000+) / VT-x (Core i3-2330E). The Core i3-2330E includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 3000), while the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-2330E targets Embedded.
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 6000+ | Core i3-2330E |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics 3000 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Embedded |
Value Analysis
The Athlon 64 X2 6000+ launched at $450 MSRP, while the Core i3-2330E debuted at $225. At current prices ($20 vs $10), the Core i3-2330E is $10 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ delivers 91.3 pts/$ vs 182.3 pts/$ for the Core i3-2330E — making the Core i3-2330E the 66.6% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 6000+ | Core i3-2330E |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $450 | $225-50% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | $10-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 91.3 | 182.3+100% |
| Release Date | 2007 | 2011 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon 64 X2 6000+ and Core i3-2330E
