Athlon 64 X2 6000+ vs Atom N2800

Athlon 64 X2 6000+ vs Atom N2800 Performance Spectrum

Athlon 64 X2 6000+

2 / 2

1,825

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Atom N2800

2 / 4

1,829

+0.2%

Pentium B950

Celeron G470

Pentium J3710

Celeron Dual-Core T1500

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 64 X2 6000+ vs Atom N2800 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 64 X2 6000+ vs Atom N2800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 64 X2 6000+

2007

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,825 vs 1,829).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 4.1 vs 38.9 PassMark/$ ($450 MSRP vs $47 MSRP).
❌1685.7% higher power demand at 125W vs 7W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom N2800 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Atom N2800

2011

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $403 less on MSRP ($47 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
✅Delivers 859.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 38.9 vs 4.1 PassMark/$ ($47 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
✅Draws 7W instead of 125W, a 118W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom N2800 better than Athlon 64 X2 6000+?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon 64 X2 6000+ is ahead with a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Atom N2800 pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom N2800 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom N2800 is the better buy right now. Atom N2800 comes in $403 cheaper on MSRP at $47 MSRP versus $450 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.2% better PassMark. The compromise is that Athlon 64 X2 6000+ is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 859.5% better value on MSRP (38.9 vs 4.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom N2800 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2007) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon 64 X2 6000+ vs Atom N2800 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 64 X2 6000+

The Athlon 64 X2 6000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,825 points. Launch price was $149.

Atom N2800

The Atom N2800 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Cedarview-M (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.87 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 6.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,829 points. Launch price was $47.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon 64 X2 6000+ packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Atom N2800's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ versus 1.87 GHz on the Atom N2800 — a 49.5% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 X2 6000+. The Athlon 64 X2 6000+ uses the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture (90 nm), while the Atom N2800 uses Cedarview-M (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ scores 1,825 against the Atom N2800's 1,829 — a 0.2% lead for the Atom N2800. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Athlon 64 X2 6000+	Atom N2800
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.1 GHz+66%	1.87 GHz
Base Clock	—	1.86 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512K	512K (per core)
Process	90 nm	32 nm-64%
Architecture	Windsor (2006−2007)	Cedarview-M (2011−2012)
PassMark	1,825	1,829

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 X2 6000+ uses the AM2 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Atom N2800 uses FCBGA559 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ versus DDR3-1066 on the Atom N2800 — the Atom N2800 supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon 64 X2 6000+ supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Athlon 64 X2 6000+) vs 1 (Atom N2800). PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon 64 X2 6000+) vs 4 (Atom N2800) — the Atom N2800 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM2 (Athlon 64 X2 6000+) and Intel NM10 (Atom N2800).

Feature	Athlon 64 X2 6000+	Atom N2800
Socket	AM2	FCBGA559
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800	DDR3-1066+33%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+300%	4 GB
RAM Channels	2+100%	1
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	4

🔧

Advanced Features

The Atom N2800 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3650), while the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ requires a dedicated GPU.

Feature	Athlon 64 X2 6000+	Atom N2800
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Intel GMA 3650

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ was priced at $450, while the Atom N2800 came in at $47. On launch pricing ($450 vs $47), Atom N2800 was $403 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ delivers 4.1 pts/$ vs 38.9 pts/$ for the Atom N2800 — making the Atom N2800 the 162.2% better value option.

Feature	Athlon 64 X2 6000+	Atom N2800
MSRP	$450	$47-90%
Performance per Dollar	4.1	38.9+849%
Release Date	2007	2011

Search Athlon 64 X2 6000+ on Amazon

Search Atom N2800 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.