
Athlon 64 X2 6000+

Core i3-2105
Athlon 64 X2 6000+ vs Core i3-2105 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon 64 X2 6000+ vs Core i3-2105 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon 64 X2 6000+ vs Core i3-2105: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon 64 X2 6000+
2007Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,825 vs 1,837).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 4.1 vs 13.3 PassMark/$ ($450 MSRP vs $138 MSRP).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-2105 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i3-2105
2011Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $312 less on MSRP ($138 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 228.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 13.3 vs 4.1 PassMark/$ ($138 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-2105 better than Athlon 64 X2 6000+?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon 64 X2 6000+ vs Core i3-2105 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 64 X2 6000+
The Athlon 64 X2 6000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,825 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i3-2105
The Core i3-2105 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 22 May 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,837 points. Launch price was $145.
Processing Power
The Athlon 64 X2 6000+ packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-2105's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ versus 3.1 GHz on the Core i3-2105 — identical boost frequencies. The Athlon 64 X2 6000+ uses the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture (90 nm), while the Core i3-2105 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ scores 1,825 against the Core i3-2105's 1,837 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i3-2105. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-2105.
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 6000+ | Core i3-2105 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.1 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | — | 3.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 90 nm | 32 nm-64% |
| Architecture | Windsor (2006−2007) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 1,825 | 1,837 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon 64 X2 6000+ uses the AM2 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i3-2105 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ versus DDR3-1333 on the Core i3-2105 — the Core i3-2105 supports 66.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-2105 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon 64 X2 6000+) vs 16 (Core i3-2105) — the Core i3-2105 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 6000+ | Core i3-2105 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM2 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-800 | DDR3-1333+67% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 32 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Athlon 64 X2 6000+) / VT-x (Core i3-2105). The Core i3-2105 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 3000), while the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-2105 targets Desktop.
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 6000+ | Core i3-2105 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics 3000 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ was priced at $450, while the Core i3-2105 came in at $138. On launch pricing ($450 vs $138), Core i3-2105 was $312 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ delivers 4.1 pts/$ vs 13.3 pts/$ for the Core i3-2105 — making the Core i3-2105 the 106.6% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 6000+ | Core i3-2105 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $450 | $138-69% |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.1 | 13.3+224% |
| Release Date | 2007 | 2011 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















