Athlon 64 X2 6000+ vs Core i3-2367M

Athlon 64 X2 6000+ vs Core i3-2367M Performance Spectrum

Athlon 64 X2 6000+

2 / 2

1,825

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-2367M

2 / 4

1,827

+0.1%

Pentium B950

Core i3-2310M

Pentium J3710

Celeron Dual-Core T1500

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 64 X2 6000+ vs Core i3-2367M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 64 X2 6000+ vs Core i3-2367M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 64 X2 6000+

2007

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,825 vs 1,827).
❌Launch MSRP is still $450 MSRP, while Core i3-2367M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌635.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 17W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-2367M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i3-2367M

2011

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 17W instead of 125W, a 108W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 3000, while Athlon 64 X2 6000+ needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-2367M better than Athlon 64 X2 6000+?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon 64 X2 6000+ is ahead with a 1.5% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-2367M pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-2367M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-2367M is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i3-2367M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $450 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.1% better PassMark. Athlon 64 X2 6000+ only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2007 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (4.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM2.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-2367M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2007) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon 64 X2 6000+ vs Core i3-2367M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 64 X2 6000+

The Athlon 64 X2 6000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,825 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i3-2367M

The Core i3-2367M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,827 points. Launch price was $250.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon 64 X2 6000+ packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-2367M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ versus 1.4 GHz on the Core i3-2367M — a 75.6% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 X2 6000+. The Athlon 64 X2 6000+ uses the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture (90 nm), while the Core i3-2367M uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ scores 1,825 against the Core i3-2367M's 1,827 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i3-2367M. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-2367M.

Feature	Athlon 64 X2 6000+	Core i3-2367M
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.1 GHz+121%	1.4 GHz
Base Clock	—	1.4 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K+100%	256K (per core)
Process	90 nm	32 nm-64%
Architecture	Windsor (2006−2007)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,825	1,827

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 X2 6000+ uses the AM2 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i3-2367M uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ versus 1333 on the Core i3-2367M — the Core i3-2367M supports 66.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon 64 X2 6000+) vs 16 (Core i3-2367M) — the Core i3-2367M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM2 (Athlon 64 X2 6000+) and HM65,HM67,QM67,QS57,QS67,UM67 (Core i3-2367M).

Feature	Athlon 64 X2 6000+	Core i3-2367M
Socket	AM2	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800	1333+67%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Athlon 64 X2 6000+) / true (Core i3-2367M). The Core i3-2367M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 3000), while the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i3-2367M rivals Core 2 Duo SU9600.