Athlon 64 X2 6000+ vs Celeron N4500

Athlon 64 X2 6000+ vs Celeron N4500 Performance Spectrum

Athlon 64 X2 6000+

2 / 2

1,825

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron N4500

2 / 2

1,817

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 64 X2 6000+ vs Celeron N4500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 64 X2 6000+ vs Celeron N4500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 64 X2 6000+

2007

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $450 MSRP, while Celeron N4500 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌1983.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 6W.

Celeron N4500

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 6W instead of 125W, a 119W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon 64 X2 6000+ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,817 vs 1,825).

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon 64 X2 6000+ better than Celeron N4500?

Yes. Athlon 64 X2 6000+ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon 64 X2 6000+ is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon 64 X2 6000+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon 64 X2 6000+ is the better buy right now. Athlon 64 X2 6000+ comes in at an unclear MSRP at $450 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (4.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N4500 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2007). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon 64 X2 6000+ vs Celeron N4500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 64 X2 6000+

The Athlon 64 X2 6000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,825 points. Launch price was $149.

Celeron N4500

The Celeron N4500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.5 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1338. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,817 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ and Celeron N4500 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ versus 2.8 GHz on the Celeron N4500 — a 10.2% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 X2 6000+. The Athlon 64 X2 6000+ uses the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture (90 nm), while the Celeron N4500 uses Jasper Lake (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ scores 1,825 against the Celeron N4500's 1,817 — a 0.4% lead for the Athlon 64 X2 6000+. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ vs 4 MB (total) on the Celeron N4500.

Feature	Athlon 64 X2 6000+	Celeron N4500
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.1 GHz+11%	2.8 GHz
Base Clock	—	1.1 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K+34033%	1.5 MB (total)
Process	90 nm	10 nm-89%
Architecture	Windsor (2006−2007)	Jasper Lake (2021)
PassMark	1,825	1,817

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 X2 6000+ uses the AM2 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron N4500 uses BGA1338 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.