Athlon 64 X2 6000+
VS
Celeron N4500

Athlon 64 X2 6000+ vs Celeron N4500

AMD

Athlon 64 X2 6000+

2 Cores2 Thrd125 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2007
VS
Intel

Celeron N4500

2 Cores2 Thrd6 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2021

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Athlon 64 X2 6000+ is positioned at rank #1077 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 X2 6000+

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
76777%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
72547%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
52675%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
15869%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
12570%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
10996%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
6298%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
6216%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
5660%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
5659%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
5596%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
5445%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
5369%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
5347%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
5299%
#1077
Athlon 64 X2 6000+
MSRP: $450|Avg: $20
100%
#1078
Athlon 64 3600+
MSRP: $149|Avg: $15
98%
#1079
Core 2 Quad Q6700
MSRP: $530|Avg: $50
97%
#1080
Athlon 64 2600+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
97%
#1081
Celeron 2.20
MSRP: $79|Avg: $15
95%
#1082
Athlon 64 X2 5200+
MSRP: $420|Avg: $15
88%
#1083
Athlon 64 X2 4000+
MSRP: $328|Avg: $10
88%
#1084
Core i7-975
MSRP: $999|Avg: $50
87%
#1085
Athlon XP 2600+
MSRP: $98|Avg: $10
85%
#1086
Core i7-965
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $40
84%
#1087
Athlon 64 FX-74
MSRP: $499|Avg: $50
82%
#1088
Core 2 Extreme QX9770
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399
81%
#1089
Athlon 64 2000+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
81%
#1090
Athlon 64 X2 5600+
MSRP: $505|Avg: $15
81%
#1091
Athlon 64 X2 5400+
MSRP: $485|Avg: $78
81%
#1092
Celeron 2.30
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
80%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron N4500 (2021) utilizes 10 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightAthlon 64 X2 6000+Celeron N4500
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Windsor (2006−2007) / 90 nm)
✨ Modern (Jasper Lake (2021) / 10 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Athlon 64 X2 6000+ (2007) relies on 90 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightAthlon 64 X2 6000+Celeron N4500
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 64 X2 6000+ and Celeron N4500

AMD

Athlon 64 X2 6000+

The Athlon 64 X2 6000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,825 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Celeron N4500

The Celeron N4500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.5 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1338. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,817 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ and Celeron N4500 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ versus 2.8 GHz on the Celeron N4500 — a 10.2% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 X2 6000+. The Athlon 64 X2 6000+ uses the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture (90 nm), while the Celeron N4500 uses Jasper Lake (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ scores 1,825 against the Celeron N4500's 1,817 — a 0.4% lead for the Athlon 64 X2 6000+. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ vs 4 MB (total) on the Celeron N4500.

FeatureAthlon 64 X2 6000+Celeron N4500
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3.1 GHz+11%
2.8 GHz
Base Clock
1.1 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512K
1.5 MB (total)+200%
Process
90 nm
10 nm-89%
Architecture
Windsor (2006−2007)
Jasper Lake (2021)
PassMark
1,825
1,817
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 X2 6000+ uses the AM2 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron N4500 uses BGA1338 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAthlon 64 X2 6000+Celeron N4500
Socket
AM2
BGA1338
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 4.0+264%
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0