CPU
GPU
Athlon 64 X2 6000+
Core i7-740QM
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon 64 X2 6000+ is positioned at rank 1077 and the Core i7-740QM is on rank 1209, so the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 X2 6000+
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-740QM
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon 64 X2 6000+ | Core i7-740QM |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($20) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($378) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Windsor (2006−2007) / 90 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Clarksfield (2009−2010) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon 64 X2 6000+ | Core i7-740QM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+1773%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($20) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($378) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 64 X2 6000+ and Core i7-740QM
Athlon 64 X2 6000+
The Athlon 64 X2 6000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,825 points. Launch price was $149.
Core i7-740QM
The Core i7-740QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarksfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.73 GHz, with boost up to 2.93 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,842 points. Launch price was $546.
Processing Power
The Athlon 64 X2 6000+ packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i7-740QM offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-740QM has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ versus 2.93 GHz on the Core i7-740QM — a 5.6% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 X2 6000+. The Athlon 64 X2 6000+ uses the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture (90 nm), while the Core i7-740QM uses Clarksfield (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ scores 1,825 against the Core i7-740QM's 1,842 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i7-740QM. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-740QM.
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 6000+ | Core i7-740QM |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 8+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.1 GHz+6% | 2.93 GHz |
| Base Clock | — | 1.73 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 90 nm | 45 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Windsor (2006−2007) | Clarksfield (2009−2010) |
| PassMark | 1,825 | 1,842 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon 64 X2 6000+ uses the AM2 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i7-740QM uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ versus 1333 on the Core i7-740QM — the Core i7-740QM supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon 64 X2 6000+ supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon 64 X2 6000+) vs 16 (Core i7-740QM) — the Core i7-740QM offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM2 (Athlon 64 X2 6000+) and PM55,HM55,QM57 (Core i7-740QM).
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 6000+ | Core i7-740QM |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM2 | PGA988 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-800 | 1333+66550% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB+209715100% | 8 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Athlon 64 X2 6000+) / true (Core i7-740QM). Direct competitor: Core i7-740QM rivals Core 2 Quad Q9000.
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 6000+ | Core i7-740QM |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | true |
Value Analysis
The Athlon 64 X2 6000+ launched at $450 MSRP, while the Core i7-740QM debuted at $378.
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 6000+ | Core i7-740QM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $450 | $378-16% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | — |
| Release Date | 2007 | 2010 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon 64 X2 6000+ and Core i7-740QM
