Core i3-2375M vs Core 2 Duo T7600

Core i3-2375M

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.5 GHz2013

Core 2 Duo T7600

2 Cores2 Thrd4 WWMax: 2.33 GHz2006

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Core i3-2375M

2 / 4

1,978

0.0%

2,004

+1.3%

Core 2 Extreme X6800

Processor N50

Celeron 4305U

Pentium Dual Core T2390

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-2375M is positioned at rank 123 and the Core 2 Duo T7600 is on rank 875, so the Core i3-2375M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-2375M

#111

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

297%

#112

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

292%

#113

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

268%

#114

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

267%

#115

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

265%

#117

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

256%

#118

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

245%

#119

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

245%

#120

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

238%

#123

Core i3-2375M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#126

Celeron N4000

MSRP: $107|Avg: $30

99%

#137

N200

MSRP: $193|Avg: N/A

96%

#138

Core 2 Duo SP9600

MSRP: $316|Avg: N/A

96%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T7600

#863

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

1450%

#864

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

1428%

#865

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

1311%

#866

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

1305%

#867

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

1293%

#869

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

1249%

#870

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

1198%

#871

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

1196%

#872

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

1164%

#875

Core 2 Duo T7600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#877

Microsoft SQ1

MSRP: $300|Avg: $180

99%

#879

Core i5-6440HQ

MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A

99%

#883

Celeron Dual-Core T1600

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

99%

#884

Athlon II N330

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

99%

#889

Core i7-7820EQ

MSRP: $378|Avg: $378

98%

#890

Celeron 7305

MSRP: $128|Avg: $107

97%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i3-2375M (2013) utilizes 32 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.

Insight	Core i3-2375M	Core 2 Duo T7600
Gaming	❌ Lower gaming performance	✅ Superior gaming performance
Workstation	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks	✅ Better multi-core power
Price	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 2 Duo T7600 (2006) relies on 65 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.

Insight	Core i3-2375M	Core 2 Duo T7600
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i3-2375M Benchmark Check

Core 2 Duo T7600 Benchmark Check

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-2375M and Core 2 Duo T7600

Core i3-2375M

The Core i3-2375M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 February 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,978 points. Launch price was $250.

Core 2 Duo T7600

The Core 2 Duo T7600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 August 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.33 GHz, with boost up to 2.33 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 34 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,004 points. Launch price was $619.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-2375M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core 2 Duo T7600's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the Core i3-2375M versus 2.33 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T7600 — a 43.3% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo T7600 (base: 1.5 GHz vs 2.33 GHz). The Core i3-2375M uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T7600 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-2375M scores 1,978 against the Core 2 Duo T7600's 2,004 — a 1.3% lead for the Core 2 Duo T7600. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i3-2375M vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo T7600.

Feature	Core i3-2375M	Core 2 Duo T7600
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.5 GHz	2.33 GHz+55%
Base Clock	1.5 GHz	2.33 GHz+55%
L3 Cache	3 MB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB	4 MB+700%
Process	32 nm-51%	65 nm
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Merom (2006−2008)
PassMark	1,978	2,004+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	238	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-2375M uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo T7600 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Core i3-2375M versus DDR2-667 on the Core 2 Duo T7600 — the Core i3-2375M supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-2375M supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM65,HM67,QM67,HM75,HM76,HM77 (Core i3-2375M) and Socket P (Core 2 Duo T7600).

Feature	Core i3-2375M	Core 2 Duo T7600
Socket	BGA1023	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333+50%	DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+300%	4 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	❌	❌
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, EPT (Core i3-2375M) vs VT-x (Core 2 Duo T7600). The Core i3-2375M includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 3000), while the Core 2 Duo T7600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-2375M targets Thin & Light Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i3-2375M rivals Pentium 997.