Core i3-2375M vs Core i5-470UM

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-2375M vs Core i5-470UM FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-2375M vs Core i5-470UM: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-2375M

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 3000, while Core i5-470UM needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌2744.4% higher power demand at 512W vs 18W.

Core i5-470UM

2010

Why buy it

✅Draws 18W instead of 512W, a 494W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,973 vs 1,978).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-2375M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-2375M better than Core i5-470UM?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i5-470UM is ahead with a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-2375M pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-2375M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-2375M still makes the most sense overall. Core i3-2375M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-2375M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-2375M vs Core i5-470UM Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-2375M

The Core i3-2375M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 February 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,978 points. Launch price was $250.

Core i5-470UM

The Core i5-470UM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.33 GHz, with boost up to 1.86 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,973 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-2375M and Core i5-470UM share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the Core i3-2375M versus 1.86 GHz on the Core i5-470UM — a 21.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-470UM (base: 1.5 GHz vs 1.33 GHz). The Core i3-2375M uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-470UM uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-2375M scores 1,978 against the Core i5-470UM's 1,973 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i3-2375M. Both processors carry 3 MB of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i3-2375M	Core i5-470UM
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	1.5 GHz	1.86 GHz+24%
Base Clock	1.5 GHz+13%	1.33 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB	3 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB	512 kB
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark	1,978	1,973
Geekbench 6 Single	238	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-2375M uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-470UM uses BGA1288 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-2375M	Core i5-470UM
Socket	BGA1023	BGA1288
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, EPT (Core i3-2375M) / not specified (Core i5-470UM). The Core i3-2375M includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 3000), while the Core i5-470UM requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-2375M targets Thin & Light Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i3-2375M rivals Pentium 997.