A4-4300M vs Core i3-2375M

A4-4300M vs Core i3-2375M Performance Spectrum

A4-4300M

2 / 2

1,997

+1.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-2375M

2 / 4

1,978

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-4300M vs Core i3-2375M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-4300M vs Core i3-2375M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-4300M

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i3-2375M

2013

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A4-4300M across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,978 vs 1,997).
❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is A4-4300M better than Core i3-2375M?

Yes. A4-4300M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A4-4300M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A4-4300M is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A4-4300M still makes the most sense overall. A4-4300M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-2375M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A4-4300M vs Core i3-2375M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-4300M

The A4-4300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: unknown. Passmark benchmark score: 1,997 points. Launch price was $50.

Core i3-2375M

The Core i3-2375M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 February 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,978 points. Launch price was $250.

⚡

Processing Power

The A4-4300M packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-2375M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the A4-4300M versus 1.5 GHz on the Core i3-2375M — a 66.7% clock advantage for the A4-4300M (base: 2.5 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The A4-4300M uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-2375M uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A4-4300M scores 1,997 against the Core i3-2375M's 1,978 — a 1% lead for the A4-4300M. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 282 vs 238, a 16.9% lead for the A4-4300M that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A4-4300M vs 3 MB on the Core i3-2375M.

Feature	A4-4300M	Core i3-2375M
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3 GHz+100%	1.5 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+67%	1.5 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (total)+100%	512 kB
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Trinity (2012−2013)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,997	1,978
Geekbench 6 Single	282+18%	238

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-4300M uses the FS1r2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-2375M uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A4-4300M versus DDR3-1333 on the Core i3-2375M — the A4-4300M supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

Feature	A4-4300M	Core i3-2375M
Socket	FS1r2	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600+20%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A4-4300M) vs VT-x, EPT (Core i3-2375M). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 7420G (A4-4300M) and HD Graphics 3000 (Core i3-2375M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-4300M targets Budget Laptop, Core i3-2375M targets Thin & Light Laptop. Direct competitor: A4-4300M rivals Pentium B980; Core i3-2375M rivals Pentium 997.

Feature	A4-4300M	Core i3-2375M
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Radeon HD 7420G	HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x, EPT
Target Use	Budget Laptop	Thin & Light Laptop