A4-4300M vs Celeron M 560

A4-4300M vs Celeron M 560 Performance Spectrum

A4-4300M

2 / 2

1,997

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron M 560

1 / 1

2,008

+0.6%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-4300M vs Celeron M 560 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-4300M vs Celeron M 560: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-4300M

2012

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 7420G, while Celeron M 560 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,997 vs 2,008).
❌3400% higher power demand at 35W vs 1W.

Celeron M 560

2008

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 1W instead of 35W, a 34W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $86 MSRP, while A4-4300M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while A4-4300M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron M 560 better than A4-4300M?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A4-4300M is ahead with a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron M 560 pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron M 560 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron M 560 is the better buy right now. Celeron M 560 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $86 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.6% better PassMark. The compromise is that A4-4300M is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (23.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A4-4300M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A4-4300M vs Celeron M 560 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-4300M

The A4-4300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: unknown. Passmark benchmark score: 1,997 points. Launch price was $50.

Celeron M 560

The Celeron M 560 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.13 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,008 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The A4-4300M packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron M 560 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the A4-4300M has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the A4-4300M versus 2.13 GHz on the Celeron M 560 — a 33.9% clock advantage for the A4-4300M. The A4-4300M uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron M 560 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the A4-4300M scores 1,997 against the Celeron M 560's 2,008 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron M 560.

Feature	A4-4300M	Celeron M 560
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	3 GHz+41%	2.13 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	1 MB (total)	1 MB
Process	32 nm-51%	65 nm
Architecture	Trinity (2012−2013)	Merom (2006−2008)
PassMark	1,997	2,008
Geekbench 6 Single	282	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-4300M uses the FS1r2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron M 560 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A4-4300M versus 667 on the Celeron M 560 — the A4-4300M supports 139.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A4-4300M supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A4-4300M) vs 0 (Celeron M 560) — the A4-4300M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A4-4300M	Celeron M 560
Socket	FS1r2	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600+140%	667
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+300%	4 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A4-4300M) vs false (Celeron M 560). The A4-4300M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7420G), while the Celeron M 560 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-4300M targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: A4-4300M rivals Pentium B980; Celeron M 560 rivals Mobile Sempron 3600+.