A4-4300M
VS
Core 2 Duo T5800

A4-4300M vs Core 2 Duo T5800

AMD

A4-4300M

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 3 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo T5800

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 2 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A4-4300M is positioned at rank 647 and the Core 2 Duo T5800 is on rank 292, so the Core 2 Duo T5800 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A4-4300M

#635
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
882%
#636
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
869%
#637
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
797%
#638
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
794%
#639
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
787%
#641
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
760%
#642
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
728%
#643
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
727%
#644
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
708%
#647
A4-4300M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#650
Core i5-1345UE
MSRP: $312|Avg: $312
100%
#662
Athlon II P360
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T5800

#83
Core i7-13700HX
MSRP: $485|Avg: N/A
99%
#86
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
99%
#280
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
440%
#281
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
434%
#282
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
398%
#283
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
396%
#284
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
393%
#286
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
379%
#287
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
364%
#288
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
363%
#289
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
353%
#292
Core 2 Duo T5800
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The A4-4300M leads in gaming performance. However, the Core 2 Duo T5800 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.2% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightA4-4300MCore 2 Duo T5800
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Trinity (2012−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightA4-4300MCore 2 Duo T5800
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A4-4300M and Core 2 Duo T5800

AMD

A4-4300M

The A4-4300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: unknown. Passmark benchmark score: 1,997 points. Launch price was $50.

Intel

Core 2 Duo T5800

The Core 2 Duo T5800 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,000 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

Both the A4-4300M and Core 2 Duo T5800 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the A4-4300M versus 2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T5800 — a 40% clock advantage for the A4-4300M (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The A4-4300M uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T5800 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the A4-4300M scores 1,997 against the Core 2 Duo T5800's 2,000 — a 0.2% lead for the Core 2 Duo T5800. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A4-4300M vs 2 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo T5800.

FeatureA4-4300MCore 2 Duo T5800
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3 GHz+50%
2 GHz
Base Clock
2.5 GHz+25%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
2 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache
1 MB (total)
2 MB+100%
Process
32 nm-51%
65 nm
Architecture
Trinity (2012−2013)
Merom (2006−2008)
PassMark
1,997
2,000
Geekbench 6 Single
282
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-4300M uses the FS1r2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo T5800 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureA4-4300MCore 2 Duo T5800
Socket
FS1r2
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A4-4300M) / not specified (Core 2 Duo T5800). The A4-4300M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7420G), while the Core 2 Duo T5800 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-4300M targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: A4-4300M rivals Pentium B980.

FeatureA4-4300MCore 2 Duo T5800
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 7420G
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget Laptop