A4-4300M
VS
Core 2 Quad Q9300

A4-4300M vs Core 2 Quad Q9300

AMD

A4-4300M

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 3 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Core 2 Quad Q9300

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A4-4300M is positioned at rank 647 and the Core 2 Quad Q9300 is on rank 1039, so the A4-4300M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A4-4300M

#635
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
882%
#636
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
869%
#637
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
797%
#638
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
794%
#639
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
787%
#641
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
760%
#642
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
728%
#643
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
727%
#644
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
708%
#647
A4-4300M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#650
Core i5-1345UE
MSRP: $312|Avg: $312
100%
#662
Athlon II P360
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Quad Q9300

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
41232%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
38960%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
28288%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
8522%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
6750%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
5905%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
3382%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
3338%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
3039%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
3039%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
3005%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2924%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2883%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2872%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2846%
#1039
Core 2 Quad Q9300
MSRP: $266|Avg: $27
100%
#1040
Athlon II X4 638
MSRP: $300|Avg: $280
100%
#1041
Core 2 Duo E7200
MSRP: $133|Avg: $133
100%
#1043
Phenom X3 8750
MSRP: $195|Avg: $20
98%
#1044
Pentium G4400TE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $250
97%
#1045
Celeron 2.60
MSRP: $53|Avg: $10
96%
#1046
Core i7-990X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $225
94%
#1047
Phenom X4 9750B
MSRP: $215|Avg: $34
94%
#1048
Core 2 Duo E8200
MSRP: $163|Avg: $20
93%
#1049
Core 2 Quad Q9450
MSRP: $316|Avg: $15
92%
#1050
Core 2 Duo E8600
MSRP: $200|Avg: $95
91%
#1051
Core 2 Duo E6320
MSRP: $163|Avg: $5
90%
#1052
Core i7-980X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $150
90%
#1053
Athlon 64 X2 3600+
MSRP: $150|Avg: $10
90%
#1054
Core 2 Duo E6420
MSRP: $183|Avg: $10
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The A4-4300M leads in gaming performance. However, the Core 2 Quad Q9300 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.7% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightA4-4300MCore 2 Quad Q9300
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($27)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Trinity (2012−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Yorkfield (2007−2009) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightA4-4300MCore 2 Quad Q9300
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($27)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A4-4300M and Core 2 Quad Q9300

AMD

A4-4300M

The A4-4300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: unknown. Passmark benchmark score: 1,997 points. Launch price was $50.

Intel

Core 2 Quad Q9300

The Core 2 Quad Q9300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,011 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

The A4-4300M packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core 2 Quad Q9300 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Core 2 Quad Q9300 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the A4-4300M versus 2.5 GHz on the Core 2 Quad Q9300 — a 18.2% clock advantage for the A4-4300M (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The A4-4300M uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Quad Q9300 uses Yorkfield (2007−2009) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A4-4300M scores 1,997 against the Core 2 Quad Q9300's 2,011 — a 0.7% lead for the Core 2 Quad Q9300. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureA4-4300MCore 2 Quad Q9300
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3 GHz+20%
2.5 GHz
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB (total)
6 MB (total)+500%
Process
32 nm-29%
45 nm
Architecture
Trinity (2012−2013)
Yorkfield (2007−2009)
PassMark
1,997
2,011
Geekbench 6 Single
282
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-4300M uses the FS1r2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Quad Q9300 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

FeatureA4-4300MCore 2 Quad Q9300
Socket
FS1r2
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A4-4300M) / not specified (Core 2 Quad Q9300). The A4-4300M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7420G), while the Core 2 Quad Q9300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-4300M targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: A4-4300M rivals Pentium B980.

FeatureA4-4300MCore 2 Quad Q9300
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 7420G
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget Laptop