A4-4300M vs Celeron N3450

A4-4300M vs Celeron N3450 Performance Spectrum

A4-4300M

2 / 2

1,997

+0.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron N3450

4 / 4

1,981

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-4300M vs Celeron N3450 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-4300M vs Celeron N3450: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-4300M

2012

Why buy it

✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 6) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌483.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 6W.

Celeron N3450

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 6W instead of 35W, a 29W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,981 vs 1,997).

Quick Answers

So, is A4-4300M better than Celeron N3450?

Yes. A4-4300M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A4-4300M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A4-4300M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A4-4300M still makes the most sense overall. A4-4300M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N3450 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A4-4300M vs Celeron N3450 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-4300M

The A4-4300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: unknown. Passmark benchmark score: 1,997 points. Launch price was $50.

Celeron N3450

The Celeron N3450 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1296. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,981 points. Launch price was $107.

⚡

Processing Power

The A4-4300M packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron N3450 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron N3450 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the A4-4300M versus 2.2 GHz on the Celeron N3450 — a 30.8% clock advantage for the A4-4300M (base: 2.5 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The A4-4300M uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron N3450 uses Apollo Lake (2014−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A4-4300M scores 1,997 against the Celeron N3450's 1,981 — a 0.8% lead for the A4-4300M. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	A4-4300M	Celeron N3450
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3 GHz+36%	2.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+127%	1.1 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB (total)	2 MB+100%
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Trinity (2012−2013)	Apollo Lake (2014−2016)
PassMark	1,997	1,981
Geekbench 6 Single	282	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-4300M uses the FS1r2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron N3450 uses FCBGA1296 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A4-4300M versus 2400 on the Celeron N3450 — the Celeron N3450 supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A4-4300M supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A4-4300M) vs 6 (Celeron N3450) — the A4-4300M offers 10 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A4-4300M	Celeron N3450
Socket	FS1r2	FCBGA1296
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	2400+50%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+100%	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16+167%	6

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A4-4300M) vs true (Celeron N3450). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 7420G (A4-4300M) and Intel HD Graphics 500 (Celeron N3450) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-4300M targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: A4-4300M rivals Pentium B980; Celeron N3450 rivals AMD A4-9120.