Core i3-3110M vs Core i7-720QM

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-3110M vs Core i7-720QM FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-3110M vs Core i7-720QM: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-3110M

2012

Why buy it

✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4000, while Core i7-720QM needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,656 vs 1,658).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 6 MB).
❌1037.8% higher power demand at 512W vs 45W.

Core i7-720QM

2009

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Draws 45W instead of 512W, a 467W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $364 MSRP, while Core i3-3110M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-3110M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-720QM better than Core i3-3110M?

Yes. Core i7-720QM is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 29 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-720QM is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 29 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-720QM is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-720QM is the better buy right now. Core i7-720QM comes in at an unclear MSRP at $364 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 29 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (4.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-3110M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-3110M vs Core i7-720QM Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-3110M

The Core i3-3110M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,656 points. Launch price was $225.

Core i7-720QM

The Core i7-720QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Clarksfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,658 points. Launch price was $546.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-3110M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-720QM offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-720QM has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Core i3-3110M versus 2.8 GHz on the Core i7-720QM — a 15.4% clock advantage for the Core i7-720QM (base: 2.4 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Core i3-3110M uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-720QM uses Clarksfield (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-3110M scores 1,656 against the Core i7-720QM's 1,658 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i7-720QM. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-3110M vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-720QM.

Feature	Core i3-3110M	Core i7-720QM
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 8+100%
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz	2.8 GHz+17%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+50%	1.6 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	6 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm-51%	45 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Clarksfield (2009−2010)
PassMark	1,656	1,658
Geekbench 6 Single	424	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	846	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the PGA988 socket with PCIe 3.0. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-3110M versus 1333 on the Core i7-720QM — the Core i3-3110M supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-3110M supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM75,HM76,HM77,QM77 (Core i3-3110M) and PM55,HM55,QM57 (Core i7-720QM).

Feature	Core i3-3110M	Core i7-720QM
Socket	PGA988	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600+20%	1333
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+300%	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Core i3-3110M) vs true (Core i7-720QM). The Core i3-3110M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4000), while the Core i7-720QM requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-3110M targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i3-3110M rivals AMD A8-4500M; Core i7-720QM rivals Core 2 Quad Q9000.