A10-4655M vs Core i3-3110M

A10-4655M vs Core i3-3110M Performance Spectrum

A10-4655M

4 / 4

1,654

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-3110M

2 / 4

1,656

+0.1%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-4655M vs Core i3-3110M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-4655M vs Core i3-3110M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-4655M

2012

Why buy it

✅Draws 25W instead of 512W, a 487W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,654 vs 1,656).

Core i3-3110M

2012

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌1948% higher power demand at 512W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-4655M better than Core i3-3110M?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A10-4655M is ahead with a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-3110M pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-3110M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-4655M still makes the most sense overall. A10-4655M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-3110M is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

A10-4655M vs Core i3-3110M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-4655M

The A10-4655M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FP2. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 1,654 points. Launch price was $130.

Core i3-3110M

The Core i3-3110M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,656 points. Launch price was $225.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-4655M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-3110M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-4655M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the A10-4655M versus 2.4 GHz on the Core i3-3110M — a 15.4% clock advantage for the A10-4655M (base: 2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The A10-4655M uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-3110M uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A10-4655M scores 1,654 against the Core i3-3110M's 1,656 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i3-3110M. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-4655M vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-3110M.

Feature	A10-4655M	Core i3-3110M
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz+17%	2.4 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.4 GHz+20%
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4 MB (total)	256K (per core)+6300%
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Trinity (2012−2013)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark	1,654	1,656
Geekbench 6 Single	—	424
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	846

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-4655M uses the FP2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-3110M uses PGA988 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1333 on the A10-4655M versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-3110M — the Core i3-3110M supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-3110M supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: FP2 (A10-4655M) and HM75,HM76,HM77,QM77 (Core i3-3110M).

Feature	A10-4655M	Core i3-3110M
Socket	FP2	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	1333	DDR3-1600+20%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	32 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A10-4655M) vs VT-x (Core i3-3110M). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 7620G (A10-4655M) and Intel HD Graphics 4000 (Core i3-3110M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-3110M targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: A10-4655M rivals Core i3-4010U; Core i3-3110M rivals AMD A8-4500M.