A10-4655M vs Core 2 Duo T9300

A10-4655M vs Core 2 Duo T9300 Performance Spectrum

A10-4655M

4 / 4

1,654

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core 2 Duo T9300

2 / 2

1,670

+1.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-4655M vs Core 2 Duo T9300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-4655M vs Core 2 Duo T9300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-4655M

2012

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 7620G, while Core 2 Duo T9300 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,654 vs 1,670).
❌316.7% higher power demand at 25W vs 6W.

Core 2 Duo T9300

2008

Why buy it

✅+1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 6W instead of 25W, a 19W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $316 MSRP, while A10-4655M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-4655M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 2 Duo T9300 better than A10-4655M?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A10-4655M is ahead with a 0.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo T9300 pulls ahead with 1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo T9300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core 2 Duo T9300 is the better buy right now. Core 2 Duo T9300 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $316 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1% better PassMark. The compromise is that A10-4655M is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (5.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10-4655M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A10-4655M vs Core 2 Duo T9300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-4655M

The A10-4655M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FP2. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 1,654 points. Launch price was $130.

Core 2 Duo T9300

The Core 2 Duo T9300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,670 points. Launch price was $316.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-4655M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo T9300 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A10-4655M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the A10-4655M versus 2.5 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T9300 — a 11.3% clock advantage for the A10-4655M (base: 2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The A10-4655M uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T9300 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A10-4655M scores 1,654 against the Core 2 Duo T9300's 1,670 — a 1% lead for the Core 2 Duo T9300. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-4655M vs 6 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo T9300.

Feature	A10-4655M	Core 2 Duo T9300
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz+12%	2.5 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.5 GHz+25%
L3 Cache	0 kB	6 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	4 MB (total)	6 MB+50%
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Trinity (2012−2013)	Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark	1,654	1,670
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	432

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-4655M uses the FP2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo T9300 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1333 on the A10-4655M versus DDR3-1066 on the Core 2 Duo T9300 — the A10-4655M supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Chipset compatibility: FP2 (A10-4655M) and GM965,PM965,GM45,PM45 (Core 2 Duo T9300).

Feature	A10-4655M	Core 2 Duo T9300
Socket	FP2	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	1333+25%	DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity	16	—
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A10-4655M) vs VT-x (Core 2 Duo T9300). The A10-4655M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7620G), while the Core 2 Duo T9300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T9300 targets Budget. Direct competitor: A10-4655M rivals Core i3-4010U; Core 2 Duo T9300 rivals Athlon Silver 3050U.