A10-4655M vs Athlon 64 FX-74

A10-4655M vs Athlon 64 FX-74 Performance Spectrum

A10-4655M

4 / 4

1,654

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Athlon 64 FX-74

2 / 2

1,658

+0.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-4655M vs Athlon 64 FX-74 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-4655M vs Athlon 64 FX-74: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-4655M

2012

Why buy it

✅Draws 25W instead of 125W, a 100W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 7620G, while Athlon 64 FX-74 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,654 vs 1,658).

Athlon 64 FX-74

2006

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $499 MSRP, while A10-4655M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌400% higher power demand at 125W vs 25W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-4655M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon 64 FX-74 better than A10-4655M?

Yes. Athlon 64 FX-74 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon 64 FX-74 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon 64 FX-74 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon 64 FX-74 is the better buy right now. Athlon 64 FX-74 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $499 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (3.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10-4655M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2006). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A10-4655M vs Athlon 64 FX-74 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-4655M

The A10-4655M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FP2. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 1,654 points. Launch price was $130.

Athlon 64 FX-74

The Athlon 64 FX-74 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Novembro 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: F. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 1,658 points. Launch price was $500.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-4655M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon 64 FX-74 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A10-4655M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the A10-4655M versus 3 GHz on the Athlon 64 FX-74 — a 6.9% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 FX-74. The A10-4655M uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon 64 FX-74 uses Windsor (2006−2007) (90 nm). In PassMark, the A10-4655M scores 1,654 against the Athlon 64 FX-74's 1,658 — a 0.2% lead for the Athlon 64 FX-74. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	A10-4655M	Athlon 64 FX-74
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz	3 GHz+7%
Base Clock	2 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	4 MB (total)+300%	1 MB
Process	32 nm-64%	90 nm
Architecture	Trinity (2012−2013)	Windsor (2006−2007)
PassMark	1,654	1,658
Geekbench 6 Single	—	400
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	750

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-4655M uses the FP2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon 64 FX-74 uses F (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1333 on the A10-4655M versus DDR2 on the Athlon 64 FX-74 — the A10-4655M supports 66550% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: FP2 (A10-4655M) and nForce 680a (Athlon 64 FX-74).

Feature	A10-4655M	Athlon 64 FX-74
Socket	FP2	F
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	1333+66550%	DDR2
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Athlon 64 FX-74 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: true (A10-4655M) vs AMD-V (Athlon 64 FX-74). The A10-4655M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7620G), while the Athlon 64 FX-74 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon 64 FX-74 targets Budget. Direct competitor: A10-4655M rivals Core i3-4010U; Athlon 64 FX-74 rivals Pentium Extreme Edition 965.