A10-4655M vs Xeon E5504

A10-4655M vs Xeon E5504 Performance Spectrum

A10-4655M

4 / 4

1,654

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon E5504

4 / 4

1,652

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-4655M vs Xeon E5504 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-4655M vs Xeon E5504: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-4655M

2012

Why buy it

✅Draws 25W instead of 80W, a 55W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 7620G, while Xeon E5504 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon E5504

2009

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,652 vs 1,654).
❌220% higher power demand at 80W vs 25W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-4655M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-4655M better than Xeon E5504?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5504 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while A10-4655M is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A10-4655M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10-4655M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-4655M still makes the most sense overall. A10-4655M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10-4655M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10-4655M vs Xeon E5504 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-4655M

The A10-4655M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FP2. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 1,654 points. Launch price was $130.

Xeon E5504

The Xeon E5504 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 March 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Gainestown (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,652 points. Launch price was $60.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A10-4655M and Xeon E5504 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the A10-4655M versus 2 GHz on the Xeon E5504 — a 33.3% clock advantage for the A10-4655M (base: 2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The A10-4655M uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E5504 uses Gainestown (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A10-4655M scores 1,654 against the Xeon E5504's 1,652 — a 0.1% lead for the A10-4655M. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-4655M vs 4 MB (total) on the Xeon E5504.

Feature	A10-4655M	Xeon E5504
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz+40%	2 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	2 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4 MB (total)+1500%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Trinity (2012−2013)	Gainestown (2009−2010)
PassMark	1,654	1,652

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-4655M uses the FP2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E5504 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A10-4655M	Xeon E5504
Socket	FP2	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	16	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (A10-4655M) / not specified (Xeon E5504). The A10-4655M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7620G), while the Xeon E5504 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A10-4655M rivals Core i3-4010U.