A10-4655M vs Core i3-4010U

A10-4655M vs Core i3-4010U Performance Spectrum

A10-4655M

4 / 4

1,654

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-4010U

2 / 4

1,660

+0.4%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-4655M vs Core i3-4010U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-4655M vs Core i3-4010U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-4655M

2012

Why buy it

✅Draws 25W instead of 512W, a 487W reduction.
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-4010U across 44 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,654 vs 1,660).

Core i3-4010U

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.0% higher average FPS across 44 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌1948% higher power demand at 512W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-4010U better than A10-4655M?

Yes. Core i3-4010U is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.0% average FPS lead across 44 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-4010U is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.0% more average FPS across 44 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4010U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-4010U still makes the most sense overall. Core i3-4010U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.0% average FPS lead across 44 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-4010U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10-4655M vs Core i3-4010U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-4655M

The A10-4655M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FP2. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 1,654 points. Launch price was $130.

Core i3-4010U

The Core i3-4010U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,660 points. Launch price was $281.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-4655M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-4010U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-4655M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the A10-4655M versus 1.7 GHz on the Core i3-4010U — a 48.9% clock advantage for the A10-4655M (base: 2 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The A10-4655M uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-4010U uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A10-4655M scores 1,654 against the Core i3-4010U's 1,660 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i3-4010U. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-4655M vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-4010U.

Feature	A10-4655M	Core i3-4010U
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz+65%	1.7 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz+18%	1.7 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4 MB (total)	256K (per core)+6300%
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Trinity (2012−2013)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	1,654	1,660

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-4655M uses the FP2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-4010U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1333 on the A10-4655M versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i3-4010U — the Core i3-4010U supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A10-4655M) vs 12 (Core i3-4010U) — the A10-4655M offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A10-4655M	Core i3-4010U
Socket	FP2	FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	1333	DDR3L-1600+20%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16+33%	12

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A10-4655M) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4010U). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 7620G (A10-4655M) and HD Graphics 4400 (Core i3-4010U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4010U targets Mobile. Direct competitor: A10-4655M rivals Core i3-4010U.