A10-4655M vs Core i7-720QM

A10-4655M vs Core i7-720QM Performance Spectrum

A10-4655M

4 / 4

1,654

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i7-720QM

4 / 8

1,658

+0.2%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-4655M vs Core i7-720QM FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-4655M vs Core i7-720QM: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-4655M

2012

Why buy it

✅Draws 25W instead of 45W, a 20W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 7620G, while Core i7-720QM needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,654 vs 1,658).

Core i7-720QM

2009

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $364 MSRP, while A10-4655M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌80% higher power demand at 45W vs 25W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-4655M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-720QM better than A10-4655M?

Yes. Core i7-720QM is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.9% average FPS lead across 29 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-720QM is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-720QM is the better buy right now. Core i7-720QM comes in at an unclear MSRP at $364 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.9% average FPS lead across 29 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (4.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10-4655M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A10-4655M vs Core i7-720QM Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-4655M

The A10-4655M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FP2. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 1,654 points. Launch price was $130.

Core i7-720QM

The Core i7-720QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Clarksfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,658 points. Launch price was $546.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-4655M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-720QM's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the A10-4655M versus 2.8 GHz on the Core i7-720QM — identical boost frequencies (base: 2 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The A10-4655M uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i7-720QM uses Clarksfield (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A10-4655M scores 1,654 against the Core i7-720QM's 1,658 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i7-720QM. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-4655M vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-720QM.

Feature	A10-4655M	Core i7-720QM
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz	2.8 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz+25%	1.6 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	6 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4 MB (total)+1500%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Trinity (2012−2013)	Clarksfield (2009−2010)
PassMark	1,654	1,658

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-4655M uses the FP2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-720QM uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 1333 memory speed. The A10-4655M supports up to 16 of RAM compared to 8 — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: FP2 (A10-4655M) and PM55,HM55,QM57 (Core i7-720QM).

Feature	A10-4655M	Core i7-720QM
Socket	FP2	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	1333	1333
Max RAM Capacity	16+100%	8
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support true virtualization. The A10-4655M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7620G), while the Core i7-720QM requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A10-4655M rivals Core i3-4010U; Core i7-720QM rivals Core 2 Quad Q9000.