A10-4655M vs Core i3-4005U

A10-4655M vs Core i3-4005U Performance Spectrum

A10-4655M

4 / 4

1,654

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-4005U

2 / 4

1,652

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-4655M vs Core i3-4005U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-4655M vs Core i3-4005U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-4655M

2012

Why buy it

✅Draws 25W instead of 512W, a 487W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 7620G, while Core i3-4005U needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i3-4005U

2013

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,652 vs 1,654).
❌1948% higher power demand at 512W vs 25W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-4655M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-4655M better than Core i3-4005U?

Yes. A10-4655M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A10-4655M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10-4655M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-4655M still makes the most sense overall. A10-4655M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-4005U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A10-4655M vs Core i3-4005U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-4655M

The A10-4655M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FP2. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 1,654 points. Launch price was $130.

Core i3-4005U

The Core i3-4005U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,652 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-4655M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-4005U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-4655M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the A10-4655M versus 1.7 GHz on the Core i3-4005U — a 48.9% clock advantage for the A10-4655M (base: 2 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The A10-4655M uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-4005U uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A10-4655M scores 1,654 against the Core i3-4005U's 1,652 — a 0.1% lead for the A10-4655M. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-4655M vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-4005U.

Feature	A10-4655M	Core i3-4005U
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz+65%	1.7 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz+18%	1.7 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4 MB (total)	256K (per core)+6300%
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Trinity (2012−2013)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	1,654	1,652

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-4655M uses the FP2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-4005U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A10-4655M	Core i3-4005U
Socket	FP2	FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	16	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (A10-4655M) / not specified (Core i3-4005U). The A10-4655M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7620G), while the Core i3-4005U requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A10-4655M rivals Core i3-4010U.