Core i3-3217U
VS
Core 2 Duo E4600

Core i3-3217U vs Core 2 Duo E4600

Intel

Core i3-3217U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo E4600

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2007

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-3217U is positioned at rank 684 and the Core 2 Duo E4600 is on rank 1006, so the Core i3-3217U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-3217U

#672
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
957%
#673
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
943%
#674
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
866%
#675
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
862%
#676
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
854%
#678
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
825%
#679
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
791%
#680
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
790%
#681
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
768%
#684
Core i3-3217U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#695
Processor N95
MSRP: $160|Avg: $80
98%
#699
Athlon Silver 3050e
MSRP: $100|Avg: $60
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E4600

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
33554%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
31705%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
23020%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
6935%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
5493%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
4806%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2752%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2716%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
2473%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
2473%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2446%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2380%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2346%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2337%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2316%
#1006
Core 2 Duo E4600
MSRP: $133|Avg: $9.6
100%
#1008
Core i7-870S
MSRP: $300|Avg: $80
99%
#1009
Core 2 Duo E6540
MSRP: $163|Avg: $15
99%
#1010
Celeron 430
MSRP: $49|Avg: $10
98%
#1011
Athlon X2 BE-2300
MSRP: $100|Avg: $80
97%
#1012
Core i7-875K
MSRP: $353|Avg: $175
97%
#1013
Core i5-670
MSRP: $284|Avg: $100
97%
#1014
Core i5-680
MSRP: $294|Avg: $10
96%
#1015
Core 2 Duo E4300
MSRP: $113|Avg: $5
96%
#1017
Core 2 Duo E4500
MSRP: $133|Avg: $10
94%
#1019
Core 2 Duo E7600
MSRP: $133|Avg: $50
93%
#1020
Core i7-3970X
MSRP: $990|Avg: $60
93%
#1021
Core 2 Duo E8700
MSRP: $256|Avg: $30
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core 2 Duo E4600 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core i3-3217U in both compute-intensive tasks (0.7% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i3-3217UCore 2 Duo E4600
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($9.6)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Allendale (2006−2009) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i3-3217UCore 2 Duo E4600
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($9.6)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-3217U and Core 2 Duo E4600

Intel

Core i3-3217U

The Core i3-3217U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,226 points. Launch price was $225.

Intel

Core 2 Duo E4600

The Core 2 Duo E4600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,235 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

The Core i3-3217U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core 2 Duo E4600's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Core i3-3217U versus 2.4 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E4600 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E4600 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i3-3217U uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E4600 uses Allendale (2006−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-3217U scores 1,226 against the Core 2 Duo E4600's 1,235 — a 0.7% lead for the Core 2 Duo E4600. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-3217U vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo E4600.

FeatureCore i3-3217UCore 2 Duo E4600
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.8 GHz
2.4 GHz+33%
Base Clock
1.8 GHz
2.4 GHz+33%
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
2 MB+700%
Process
22 nm-66%
65 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Allendale (2006−2009)
PassMark
1,226
1,235
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-3217U uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo E4600 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the Core i3-3217U versus DDR2-800 on the Core 2 Duo E4600 — the Core i3-3217U supports 199.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-3217U supports up to 32 of RAM compared to 16 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i3-3217U) vs 0 (Core 2 Duo E4600) — the Core i3-3217U offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM76,UM77,QM77,QS77 (Core i3-3217U) and Q963,P35,G31 (Core 2 Duo E4600).

FeatureCore i3-3217UCore 2 Duo E4600
Socket
BGA1023
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
1600+79900%
DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity
32
16 GB+52428700%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i3-3217U) / not specified (Core 2 Duo E4600). The Core i3-3217U includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4000), while the Core 2 Duo E4600 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i3-3217U rivals AMD A6-4455M.

FeatureCore i3-3217UCore 2 Duo E4600
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true