Core i3-3217UE
VS
A4-5300

Core i3-3217UE vs A4-5300

Intel

Core i3-3217UE

2 Cores4 Thrd17 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2012
VS
AMD

A4-5300

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-3217UE is positioned at rank 1187 and the A4-5300 is on rank 731, so the A4-5300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-3217UE

#1175
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
4850%
#1176
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
4779%
#1177
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
4387%
#1178
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
4367%
#1179
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
4327%
#1181
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
4179%
#1182
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
4007%
#1183
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
4000%
#1184
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3893%
#1187
Core i3-3217UE
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
100%
#1188
Celeron T3000
MSRP: $150|Avg: $54
100%
#1189
Core m7-6Y75
MSRP: $393|Avg: $393
99%
#1190
Core M-5Y10
MSRP: $281|Avg: $20
97%
#1193
Celeron 900
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
93%
#1194
Pentium T3400
MSRP: $150|Avg: $90
93%
#1195
Core 2 Solo SU3500
MSRP: $262|Avg: $15
93%
#1196
Core 2 Duo E8335
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
90%
#1199
Celeron 560
MSRP: $89|Avg: $5
88%
#1200
Core i3-2312M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
87%
#1201
Celeron 857
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
87%
#1202
Celeron 925
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A4-5300

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
13684%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
12930%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
9388%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2828%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2240%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1960%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1122%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1108%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1009%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1009%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
997%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
970%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
957%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
953%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
944%
#392
Celeron G4920
MSRP: $52|Avg: $115
98%
#731
A4-5300
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#732
Core i3-4350T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $20
100%
#733
Athlon II X4 641
MSRP: $102|Avg: $102
100%
#734
Athlon II X3 460
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
99%
#735
Pentium G2100T
MSRP: $75|Avg: $10
99%
#736
Core i5-3330
MSRP: $182|Avg: $21
99%
#737
Core i3-4330T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $15
99%
#738
Pentium E5300
MSRP: $62|Avg: $25
99%
#739
Athlon II X2 215
MSRP: $45|Avg: $10
99%
#740
Core i7-4790S
MSRP: $312|Avg: $60
98%
#741
FX-6100
MSRP: $165|Avg: $25
98%
#742
Pentium G2020T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $69
98%
#743
Core i7-4771
MSRP: $320|Avg: $78
98%
#745
Core i7-4770S
MSRP: $305|Avg: $35
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The A4-5300 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core i3-3217UE in both compute-intensive tasks (0.4% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i3-3217UEA4-5300
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($35)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Trinity (2012−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i3-3217UEA4-5300
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($35)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-3217UE and A4-5300

Intel

Core i3-3217UE

The Core i3-3217UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 August 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 1,362 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

A4-5300

The A4-5300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,367 points. Launch price was $50.

Processing Power

The Core i3-3217UE packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the A4-5300's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Core i3-3217UE versus 3.6 GHz on the A4-5300 — a 76.9% clock advantage for the A4-5300. The Core i3-3217UE uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the A4-5300 uses Trinity (2012−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-3217UE scores 1,362 against the A4-5300's 1,367 — a 0.4% lead for the A4-5300. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 353 vs 372, a 5.2% lead for the A4-5300 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-3217UE vs 0 kB on the A4-5300.

FeatureCore i3-3217UEA4-5300
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.6 GHz
3.6 GHz+125%
Base Clock
3.4 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
1 MB (per core)+300%
Process
22 nm-31%
32 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Trinity (2012−2013)
PassMark
1,362
1,367
Geekbench 6 Single
353
372+5%
Geekbench 6 Multi
790
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-3217UE uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the A4-5300 uses FM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. The A4-5300 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM65,QM77 (Core i3-3217UE) and A55,A75,A85X (A4-5300).

FeatureCore i3-3217UEA4-5300
Socket
BGA1023
FM2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
32 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: Yes (Core i3-3217UE) vs AMD-V (A4-5300). Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics 4000 (Core i3-3217UE) and Radeon HD 7480D (A4-5300) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-3217UE targets Embedded, A4-5300 targets Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: A4-5300 rivals Celeron G1620.

FeatureCore i3-3217UEA4-5300
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 4000
Radeon HD 7480D
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
Yes
AMD-V
Target Use
Embedded
Budget Desktop