Core i3-3240
VS
Core i7-3537U

Core i3-3240 vs Core i7-3537U

Intel

Core i3-3240

2 Cores4 Thrd55 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Core i7-3537U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-3240 is positioned at rank 847 and the Core i7-3537U is on rank 1165, so the Core i3-3240 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-3240

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
17492%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
16529%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
12001%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3615%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2864%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2505%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1435%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1416%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1289%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1289%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1275%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1241%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1223%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1218%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1207%
#847
Core i3-3240
MSRP: $132|Avg: $15
100%
#848
Pentium G640T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $69
100%
#849
Core i7-5930K
MSRP: $583|Avg: $410
100%
#851
Core i3-3240T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $8
100%
#852
Athlon II X2 240
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
99%
#854
Core i5-2500S
MSRP: $192|Avg: $61
99%
#856
Athlon X2 BE-2400
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
98%
#857
Core i3-2102
MSRP: $117|Avg: $15
97%
#858
Pentium G850
MSRP: $86|Avg: $75
97%
#859
Core i5-3475S
MSRP: $249|Avg: $42
97%
#860
Core i7-2600K
MSRP: $317|Avg: $109
97%
#861
Pentium G860
MSRP: $86|Avg: $36
97%
#862
Athlon II X2 245
MSRP: $66|Avg: $15
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-3537U

#1153
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
4321%
#1154
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
4258%
#1155
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3909%
#1156
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3891%
#1157
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3855%
#1159
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3723%
#1160
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3570%
#1161
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3564%
#1162
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3468%
#1165
Core i7-3537U
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
100%
#1166
Core M-5Y10a
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1167
Core M-5Y10c
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1168
Core M-5Y31
MSRP: $281|Avg: $30
100%
#1170
Celeron 1047UE
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
99%
#1171
Core M-5Y70
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
99%
#1172
Celeron U3400
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
99%
#1173
Celeron T1600
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
98%
#1174
Pro A12-8800B
MSRP: $400|Avg: $40
98%
#1176
Core i7-2637M
MSRP: $289|Avg: N/A
96%
#1177
Core 2 Duo SL9600
MSRP: $316|Avg: N/A
96%
#1178
Athlon PRO 3045B
MSRP: $426|Avg: $180
96%
#1179
Core 2 Duo T5600
MSRP: $241|Avg: N/A
95%
#1180
Pentium N3510
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i3-3240 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core i7-3537U in both compute-intensive tasks (0.1% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i3-3240Core i7-3537U
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($15)
⚠️ Higher cost ($346)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Core i3-3240 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 96% cheaper ($15 vs $346) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCore i3-3240Core i7-3537U
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+2210%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($15)
⚠️ Higher cost ($346)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-3240 and Core i7-3537U

Intel

Core i3-3240

The Core i3-3240 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,352 points. Launch price was $75.

Intel

Core i7-3537U

The Core i7-3537U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,349 points. Launch price was $346.

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-3240 and Core i7-3537U share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i3-3240 versus 3.1 GHz on the Core i7-3537U — a 9.2% clock advantage for the Core i3-3240 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). Both are built on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture using a 22 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i3-3240 scores 2,352 against the Core i7-3537U's 2,349 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i3-3240. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-3240 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-3537U.

FeatureCore i3-3240Core i7-3537U
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz+10%
3.1 GHz
Base Clock
3.4 GHz+70%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
4 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
22 nm
22 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
2,352
2,349
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-3240 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-3537U uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i3-3240Core i7-3537U
Socket
LGA1155
BGA1023
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
1600
Max RAM Capacity
32
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i3-3240) / true (Core i7-3537U). The Core i7-3537U includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4000), while the Core i3-3240 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-3537U rivals AMD A10-4655M.

FeatureCore i3-3240Core i7-3537U
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i3-3240 launched at $132 MSRP, while the Core i7-3537U debuted at $346.

FeatureCore i3-3240Core i7-3537U
MSRP
$132-62%
$346
Avg Price (30d)
$15
Release Date
2012
2013