
Core i3-3240

Core i7-860S
Core i3-3240 vs Core i7-860S Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-3240 vs Core i7-860S FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Apex Legends

Baldur's Gate 3

Civilization VI

Dead by Daylight

Deadlock
Core i3-3240 vs Core i7-860S: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-3240
2012Why buy it
- β +1.2% higher PassMark.
- β Costs $167 less on MSRP ($132 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- β Delivers 129.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 17.8 vs 7.8 PassMark/$ ($132 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- β Draws 55W instead of 82W, a 27W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-860S across 33 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βSmaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 8 MB).
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-860S.
Core i7-860S
2010Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +3.4% higher average FPS across 33 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +166.7% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 3 MB).
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i3-3240.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (2,324 vs 2,352).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 7.8 vs 17.8 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $132 MSRP).
- β49.1% higher power demand at 82W vs 55W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-3240 better than Core i7-860S?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-3240 vs Core i7-860S Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-3240
The Core i3-3240 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012β2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,352 points. Launch price was $75.

Core i7-860S
The Core i7-860S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009β2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 3.46 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 82 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,324 points. Launch price was $422.
Processing Power
The Core i3-3240 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-860S offers 4 cores / 8 threads β the Core i7-860S has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i3-3240 versus 3.46 GHz on the Core i7-860S β a 1.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-860S (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.53 GHz). The Core i3-3240 uses the Ivy Bridge (2012β2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-860S uses Lynnfield (2009β2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-3240 scores 2,352 against the Core i7-860S's 2,324 β a 1.2% lead for the Core i3-3240. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-3240 vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-860S.
| Feature | Core i3-3240 | Core i7-860S |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 8+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.46 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+34% | 2.53 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+167% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm-51% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge (2012β2013) | Lynnfield (2009β2010) |
| PassMark | 2,352+1% | 2,324 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 451 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 1,332 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-3240 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-860S uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-3240 | Core i7-860S |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | LGA1156 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | β | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | β | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | β | 2 |
| ECC Support | β | No |
| PCIe Lanes | β | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i3-3240) / Yes (Core i7-860S).
| Feature | Core i3-3240 | Core i7-860S |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | β | No |
| AVX-512 | β | No |
| Virtualization | β | Yes |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i3-3240 was priced at $132, while the Core i7-860S came in at $299. On launch pricing ($132 vs $299), Core i3-3240 was $167 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-3240 delivers 17.8 pts/$ vs 7.8 pts/$ for the Core i7-860S β making the Core i3-3240 the 78.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-3240 | Core i7-860S |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $132-56% | $299 |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.8+128% | 7.8 |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2010 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














