Core i3-3240
VS
Xeon E5-2603

Core i3-3240 vs Xeon E5-2603

Intel

Core i3-3240

2 Cores4 Thrd55 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2603

4 Cores4 Thrd80 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-3240 is positioned at rank 847 and the Xeon E5-2603 is on rank 825, so the Xeon E5-2603 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-3240

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
17492%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
16529%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
12001%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3615%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2864%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2505%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1435%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1416%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1289%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1289%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1275%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1241%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1223%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1218%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1207%
#847
Core i3-3240
MSRP: $132|Avg: $15
100%
#848
Pentium G640T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $69
100%
#849
Core i7-5930K
MSRP: $583|Avg: $410
100%
#851
Core i3-3240T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $8
100%
#852
Athlon II X2 240
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
99%
#854
Core i5-2500S
MSRP: $192|Avg: $61
99%
#856
Athlon X2 BE-2400
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
98%
#857
Core i3-2102
MSRP: $117|Avg: $15
97%
#858
Pentium G850
MSRP: $86|Avg: $75
97%
#859
Core i5-3475S
MSRP: $249|Avg: $42
97%
#860
Core i7-2600K
MSRP: $317|Avg: $109
97%
#861
Pentium G860
MSRP: $86|Avg: $36
97%
#862
Athlon II X2 245
MSRP: $66|Avg: $15
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2603

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
17870%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
3374%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2998%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
2316%
#469
EPYC 9554
MSRP: $9087|Avg: $2795
99%
#470
Xeon Gold 6338T
MSRP: $3139|Avg: $1795
98%
#471
Xeon E5-2650 v4
MSRP: $1166|Avg: $45
98%
#472
EPYC 9845
MSRP: $13564|Avg: $8670
97%
#473
EPYC 7F32
MSRP: $2100|Avg: $179
95%
#474
EPYC 9654P
MSRP: $10625|Avg: $5345
94%
#475
EPYC 9965
MSRP: $14813|Avg: $10000
93%
#825
Xeon E5-2603
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#827
Xeon W3565
MSRP: $294|Avg: $69
99%
#837
Xeon W3550
MSRP: $294|Avg: $30
95%
#839
Xeon E5-2450
MSRP: $694|Avg: $795
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E5-2603 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightCore i3-3240Xeon E5-2603
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i3-3240 ($15), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($15 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightCore i3-3240Xeon E5-2603
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-3240 and Xeon E5-2603

Intel

Core i3-3240

The Core i3-3240 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,352 points. Launch price was $75.

Intel

Xeon E5-2603

The Xeon E5-2603 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 10240 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,325 points. Launch price was $207.

Processing Power

The Core i3-3240 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E5-2603 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5-2603 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i3-3240 versus 1.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-2603 — a 61.5% clock advantage for the Core i3-3240 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Core i3-3240 uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5-2603 uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-3240 scores 2,352 against the Xeon E5-2603's 2,325 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i3-3240. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-3240 vs 10240 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2603.

FeatureCore i3-3240Xeon E5-2603
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz+89%
1.8 GHz
Base Clock
3.4 GHz+89%
1.8 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
10240 kB (total)+233%
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
22 nm-31%
32 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
PassMark
2,352+1%
2,325
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-3240 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2603 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i3-3240Xeon E5-2603
Socket
LGA1155
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0