
Core i3-3250

Core i5-2390T
Core i3-3250 vs Core i5-2390T Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-3250 vs Core i5-2390T FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-3250 vs Core i5-2390T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-3250
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $44 less on MSRP ($138 MSRP vs $182 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 30.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 17.8 vs 13.7 PassMark/$ ($138 MSRP vs $182 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,460 vs 2,491).
- ❌57.1% higher power demand at 55W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-2390T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-2390T.
Core i5-2390T
2011Why buy it
- ✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 55W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 2000, while Core i3-3250 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i3-3250.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.7 vs 17.8 PassMark/$ ($182 MSRP vs $138 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-2390T better than Core i3-3250?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-3250 vs Core i5-2390T Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-3250
The Core i3-3250 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,460 points. Launch price was $138.

Core i5-2390T
The Core i5-2390T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,491 points. Launch price was $100.
Processing Power
Both the Core i3-3250 and Core i5-2390T share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Core i3-3250 versus 3.5 GHz on the Core i5-2390T — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i3-3250 uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i5-2390T uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-3250 scores 2,460 against the Core i5-2390T's 2,491 — a 1.3% lead for the Core i5-2390T. Both processors carry 3 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i3-3250 | Core i5-2390T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+30% | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB (total) | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm-31% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 2,460 | 2,491+1% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 614 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1155 socket with PCIe 3.0.
| Feature | Core i3-3250 | Core i5-2390T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i3-3250) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-2390T). The Core i5-2390T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 2000), while the Core i3-3250 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-2390T targets Legacy Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-2390T rivals A8-3800.
| Feature | Core i3-3250 | Core i5-2390T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics 2000 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Legacy Low Power Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i3-3250 was priced at $138, while the Core i5-2390T came in at $182. On launch pricing ($138 vs $182), Core i3-3250 was $44 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-3250 delivers 17.8 pts/$ vs 13.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-2390T — making the Core i3-3250 the 26.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-3250 | Core i5-2390T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $138-24% | $182 |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.8+30% | 13.7 |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2011 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














