A8-8600P
VS
Core i3-3250

A8-8600P vs Core i3-3250

AMD

A8-8600P

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 3 GHz2015
VS
Intel

Core i3-3250

2 Cores4 Thrd55 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A8-8600P is positioned at rank 948 and the Core i3-3250 is on rank 846, so the Core i3-3250 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A8-8600P

#936
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1786%
#937
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1760%
#938
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1615%
#939
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1608%
#940
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1593%
#942
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1539%
#943
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1475%
#944
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1473%
#945
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1433%
#948
A8-8600P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
100%
#949
FX-9800P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
100%
#951
Celeron 1020E
MSRP: $86|Avg: $20
100%
#954
Core i7-5850EQ
MSRP: $435|Avg: $370
98%
#956
Core i7-4810MQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $378
98%
#959
Celeron Dual-Core T3500
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
97%
#960
Celeron 4305UE
MSRP: $107|Avg: $107
97%
#963
Core i7-10510U
MSRP: $409|Avg: N/A
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-3250

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
17483%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
16519%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
11994%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3613%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2862%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2504%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1434%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1415%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1289%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1289%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1274%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1240%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1222%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1218%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1207%
#846
Core i3-3250
MSRP: $138|Avg: $40
100%
#847
Core i3-3240
MSRP: $132|Avg: $15
100%
#848
Pentium G640T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $69
100%
#849
Core i7-5930K
MSRP: $583|Avg: $410
100%
#851
Core i3-3240T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $8
100%
#852
Athlon II X2 240
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
99%
#854
Core i5-2500S
MSRP: $192|Avg: $61
99%
#855
Athlon X2 BE-2400
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
98%
#857
Pentium G850
MSRP: $86|Avg: $75
97%
#858
Core i3-2102
MSRP: $117|Avg: $15
97%
#859
Core i5-3475S
MSRP: $249|Avg: $42
97%
#860
Core i7-2600K
MSRP: $317|Avg: $109
97%
#861
Pentium G860
MSRP: $86|Avg: $36
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i3-3250 leads in gaming performance. However, the A8-8600P is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.2% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightA8-8600PCore i3-3250
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($30)
⚠️ Higher cost ($40)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Carrizo (2015−2018) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the A8-8600P stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 25% cheaper ($30 vs $40) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightA8-8600PCore i3-3250
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+34%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($30)
⚠️ Higher cost ($40)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A8-8600P and Core i3-3250

AMD

A8-8600P

The A8-8600P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,464 points. Launch price was $90.

Intel

Core i3-3250

The Core i3-3250 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,460 points. Launch price was $138.

Processing Power

The A8-8600P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-3250 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A8-8600P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the A8-8600P versus 3.5 GHz on the Core i3-3250 — a 15.4% clock advantage for the Core i3-3250 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The A8-8600P uses the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i3-3250 uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A8-8600P scores 2,464 against the Core i3-3250's 2,460 — a 0.2% lead for the A8-8600P.

FeatureA8-8600PCore i3-3250
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3 GHz
3.5 GHz+17%
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
3.5 GHz+119%
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2048 kB+700%
256 kB (per core)
Process
28 nm
22 nm-21%
Architecture
Carrizo (2015−2018)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
2,464
2,460
Cinebench R23 Multi
3,160
Geekbench 6 Single
499
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,300
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-8600P uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-3250 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureA8-8600PCore i3-3250
Socket
FP4
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-2133
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A8-8600P) / not specified (Core i3-3250). The A8-8600P includes integrated graphics (Radeon R6), while the Core i3-3250 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A8-8600P targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: A8-8600P rivals Core i5-5200U.

FeatureA8-8600PCore i3-3250
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon R6
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Legacy Laptop
💰

Value Analysis

The A8-8600P launched at $150 MSRP, while the Core i3-3250 debuted at $138. At current prices ($30 vs $40), the A8-8600P is $10 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the A8-8600P delivers 82.1 pts/$ vs 61.5 pts/$ for the Core i3-3250 — making the A8-8600P the 28.7% better value option.

FeatureA8-8600PCore i3-3250
MSRP
$150
$138-8%
Avg Price (30d)
$30-25%
$40
Performance per Dollar
82.1+33%
61.5
Release Date
2015
2013