A8-8600P vs Xeon D-1602

A8-8600P vs Xeon D-1602 Performance Spectrum

A8-8600P

4 / 4

2,464

+0.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon D-1602

2 / 4

2,459

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-8600P vs Xeon D-1602 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-8600P vs Xeon D-1602: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-8600P

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.8% higher average FPS across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 2W instead of 27W, a 25W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R6, while Xeon D-1602 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Xeon D-1602 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon D-1602

2019

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A8-8600P across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,459 vs 2,464).
❌1250% higher power demand at 27W vs 2W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A8-8600P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A8-8600P better than Xeon D-1602?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon D-1602 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while A8-8600P is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A8-8600P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.8% more average FPS across 47 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A8-8600P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A8-8600P is the better buy right now. A8-8600P comes in at an unclear MSRP at $150 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.8% average FPS lead across 47 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (16.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon D-1602 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2015). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A8-8600P vs Xeon D-1602 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-8600P

The A8-8600P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,464 points. Launch price was $90.

Xeon D-1602

The Xeon D-1602 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1667. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,459 points. Launch price was $106.

⚡

Processing Power

The A8-8600P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon D-1602 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A8-8600P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the A8-8600P versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon D-1602 — a 6.5% clock advantage for the Xeon D-1602 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The A8-8600P uses the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture (28 nm), while the Xeon D-1602 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A8-8600P scores 2,464 against the Xeon D-1602's 2,459 — a 0.2% lead for the A8-8600P.

Feature	A8-8600P	Xeon D-1602
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3 GHz	3.2 GHz+7%
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	2.5 GHz+56%
L3 Cache	—	3 MB
L2 Cache	2048 kB+300%	512 kB
Process	28 nm	14 nm-50%
Architecture	Carrizo (2015−2018)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	2,464	2,459
Cinebench R23 Multi	3,160	—
Geekbench 6 Single	499	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,300	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-8600P uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon D-1602 uses FCBGA1667 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A8-8600P	Xeon D-1602
Socket	FP4	FCBGA1667
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-2133	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	12	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A8-8600P) / not specified (Xeon D-1602). The A8-8600P includes integrated graphics (Radeon R6), while the Xeon D-1602 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A8-8600P targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: A8-8600P rivals Core i5-5200U.