
A8-8600P vs Core i5-3210M

A8-8600P

Core i5-3210M
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A8-8600P is positioned at rank 948 and the Core i5-3210M is on rank 158, so the Core i5-3210M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar A8-8600P
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-3210M
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | A8-8600P | Core i5-3210M |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Carrizo (2015−2018) / 28 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | A8-8600P | Core i5-3210M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+0%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A8-8600P and Core i5-3210M

A8-8600P
The A8-8600P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,464 points. Launch price was $90.

Core i5-3210M
The Core i5-3210M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,469 points. Launch price was $225.
Processing Power
The A8-8600P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-3210M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A8-8600P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the A8-8600P versus 3.1 GHz on the Core i5-3210M — a 3.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-3210M (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The A8-8600P uses the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i5-3210M uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A8-8600P scores 2,464 against the Core i5-3210M's 2,469 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i5-3210M. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 499 vs 600, a 18.4% lead for the Core i5-3210M that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,300 vs 1,400 (7.4% advantage for the Core i5-3210M).
| Feature | A8-8600P | Core i5-3210M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 3.1 GHz+3% |
| Base Clock | 1.6 GHz | 2.5 GHz+56% |
| L3 Cache | — | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2048 kB+700% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 28 nm | 22 nm-21% |
| Architecture | Carrizo (2015−2018) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| PassMark | 2,464 | 2,469 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 3,160 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 499 | 600+20% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,300 | 1,400+8% |
Memory & Platform
The A8-8600P uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-3210M uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-2133 memory speed. The Core i5-3210M supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (A8-8600P) vs 16 (Core i5-3210M) — the Core i5-3210M offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (A8-8600P) and HM76,HM77 (Core i5-3210M).
| Feature | A8-8600P | Core i5-3210M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP4 | BGA1023 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-2133 | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 32 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 12 | 16+33% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A8-8600P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-3210M). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R6 (A8-8600P) and Intel HD Graphics 4000 (Core i5-3210M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A8-8600P targets Legacy Laptop, Core i5-3210M targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: A8-8600P rivals Core i5-5200U; Core i5-3210M rivals AMD A10-4600M.
| Feature | A8-8600P | Core i5-3210M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R6 | Intel HD Graphics 4000 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Legacy Laptop | Mainstream Laptop |
Value Analysis
The A8-8600P launched at $150 MSRP, while the Core i5-3210M debuted at $225. At current prices ($30 vs $30), the Core i5-3210M is $0 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the A8-8600P delivers 82.1 pts/$ vs 82.3 pts/$ for the Core i5-3210M — making the Core i5-3210M the 0.2% better value option.
| Feature | A8-8600P | Core i5-3210M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-33% | $225 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | $30 |
| Performance per Dollar | 82.1 | 82.3 |
| Release Date | 2015 | 2012 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












