A8-8600P
VS
Core i5-3210M

A8-8600P vs Core i5-3210M

AMD

A8-8600P

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 3 GHz2015
VS
Intel

Core i5-3210M

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A8-8600P is positioned at rank 948 and the Core i5-3210M is on rank 158, so the Core i5-3210M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A8-8600P

#936
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1786%
#937
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1760%
#938
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1615%
#939
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1608%
#940
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1593%
#942
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1539%
#943
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1475%
#944
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1473%
#945
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1433%
#948
A8-8600P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
100%
#949
FX-9800P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
100%
#951
Celeron 1020E
MSRP: $86|Avg: $20
100%
#954
Core i7-5850EQ
MSRP: $435|Avg: $370
98%
#956
Core i7-4810MQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $378
98%
#959
Celeron Dual-Core T3500
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
97%
#960
Celeron 4305UE
MSRP: $107|Avg: $107
97%
#963
Core i7-10510U
MSRP: $409|Avg: N/A
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-3210M

#42
Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
MSRP: $749|Avg: N/A
100%
#146
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
333%
#147
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
328%
#148
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
301%
#149
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
300%
#150
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
297%
#152
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
287%
#153
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
275%
#154
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
274%
#155
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
267%
#158
Core i5-3210M
MSRP: $225|Avg: $30
100%
#173
Celeron N3060
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i5-3210M delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the A8-8600P in both compute-intensive tasks (0.2% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightA8-8600PCore i5-3210M
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Carrizo (2015−2018) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Core i5-3210M stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 0% cheaper ($30 vs $30) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightA8-8600PCore i5-3210M
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+0%)
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A8-8600P and Core i5-3210M

AMD

A8-8600P

The A8-8600P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,464 points. Launch price was $90.

Intel

Core i5-3210M

The Core i5-3210M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,469 points. Launch price was $225.

Processing Power

The A8-8600P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-3210M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A8-8600P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the A8-8600P versus 3.1 GHz on the Core i5-3210M — a 3.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-3210M (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The A8-8600P uses the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i5-3210M uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A8-8600P scores 2,464 against the Core i5-3210M's 2,469 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i5-3210M. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 499 vs 600, a 18.4% lead for the Core i5-3210M that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,300 vs 1,400 (7.4% advantage for the Core i5-3210M).

FeatureA8-8600PCore i5-3210M
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3 GHz
3.1 GHz+3%
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
2.5 GHz+56%
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2048 kB+700%
256K (per core)
Process
28 nm
22 nm-21%
Architecture
Carrizo (2015−2018)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
2,464
2,469
Cinebench R23 Multi
3,160
Geekbench 6 Single
499
600+20%
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,300
1,400+8%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-8600P uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-3210M uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-2133 memory speed. The Core i5-3210M supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (A8-8600P) vs 16 (Core i5-3210M) — the Core i5-3210M offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (A8-8600P) and HM76,HM77 (Core i5-3210M).

FeatureA8-8600PCore i5-3210M
Socket
FP4
BGA1023
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-2133
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
32 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
16+33%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A8-8600P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-3210M). Both include integrated graphics Radeon R6 (A8-8600P) and Intel HD Graphics 4000 (Core i5-3210M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A8-8600P targets Legacy Laptop, Core i5-3210M targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: A8-8600P rivals Core i5-5200U; Core i5-3210M rivals AMD A10-4600M.

FeatureA8-8600PCore i5-3210M
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon R6
Intel HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Legacy Laptop
Mainstream Laptop
💰

Value Analysis

The A8-8600P launched at $150 MSRP, while the Core i5-3210M debuted at $225. At current prices ($30 vs $30), the Core i5-3210M is $0 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the A8-8600P delivers 82.1 pts/$ vs 82.3 pts/$ for the Core i5-3210M — making the Core i5-3210M the 0.2% better value option.

FeatureA8-8600PCore i5-3210M
MSRP
$150-33%
$225
Avg Price (30d)
$30
$30
Performance per Dollar
82.1
82.3
Release Date
2015
2012