A8-8600P vs Core i5-4300U

A8-8600P vs Core i5-4300U Performance Spectrum

A8-8600P

4 / 4

2,464

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i5-4300U

2 / 4

2,482

+0.7%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-8600P vs Core i5-4300U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-8600P vs Core i5-4300U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-8600P

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.2% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 2W instead of 512W, a 510W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,300 vs 1,722).
❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Core i5-4300U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Core i5-4300U

2013

Why buy it

✅+32.5% higher Geekbench multi-core.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A8-8600P across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌25500% higher power demand at 512W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

So, is A8-8600P better than Core i5-4300U?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A8-8600P is ahead with a 5.2% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4300U pulls ahead with 32.5% better Geekbench multi-core.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4300U is the stronger fit. You are getting 32.5% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A8-8600P is the better buy right now. A8-8600P comes in at an unclear MSRP at $150 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.2% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i5-4300U is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 32.5% better Geekbench multi-core. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (16.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A8-8600P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A8-8600P vs Core i5-4300U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-8600P

The A8-8600P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,464 points. Launch price was $90.

Core i5-4300U

The Core i5-4300U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,482 points. Launch price was $281.

⚡

Processing Power

The A8-8600P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-4300U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A8-8600P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the A8-8600P versus 2.9 GHz on the Core i5-4300U — a 3.4% clock advantage for the A8-8600P (base: 1.6 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The A8-8600P uses the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i5-4300U uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A8-8600P scores 2,464 against the Core i5-4300U's 2,482 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i5-4300U. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 499 vs 607, a 19.5% lead for the Core i5-4300U that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,300 vs 1,722 (27.9% advantage for the Core i5-4300U).

Feature	A8-8600P	Core i5-4300U
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3 GHz+3%	2.9 GHz
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	1.9 GHz+19%
L3 Cache	—	3 MB
L2 Cache	2048 kB+300%	512 kB
Process	28 nm	22 nm-21%
Architecture	Carrizo (2015−2018)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	2,464	2,482
Cinebench R23 Multi	3,160	—
Geekbench 6 Single	499	607+22%
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,300	1,722+32%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-8600P uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-4300U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-2133 on the A8-8600P versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i5-4300U — the A8-8600P supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 12 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SoC (A8-8600P) and HM86,HM87 (Core i5-4300U).

Feature	A8-8600P	Core i5-4300U
Socket	FP4	FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-2133+33%	DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	12	12

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V (A8-8600P) vs Yes (Core i5-4300U). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R6 (A8-8600P) and Intel HD Graphics 4400 (Core i5-4300U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A8-8600P targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: A8-8600P rivals Core i5-5200U.