A8-8600P vs Celeron N4120

A8-8600P vs Celeron N4120 Performance Spectrum

A8-8600P

4 / 4

2,464

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron N4120

4 / 4

2,463

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-8600P vs Celeron N4120 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-8600P vs Celeron N4120: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-8600P

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.0% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 2W instead of 4W, a 2W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R6, while Celeron N4120 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Celeron N4120 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Celeron N4120

2019

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A8-8600P across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,463 vs 2,464).
❌100% higher power demand at 4W vs 2W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A8-8600P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A8-8600P better than Celeron N4120?

Yes. A8-8600P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.0% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A8-8600P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.0% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A8-8600P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A8-8600P is the better buy right now. A8-8600P comes in at an unclear MSRP at $150 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.0% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (16.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N4120 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2015). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A8-8600P vs Celeron N4120 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-8600P

The A8-8600P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,464 points. Launch price was $90.

Celeron N4120

The Celeron N4120 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,463 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A8-8600P and Celeron N4120 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the A8-8600P versus 2.6 GHz on the Celeron N4120 — a 14.3% clock advantage for the A8-8600P (base: 1.6 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The A8-8600P uses the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron N4120 uses Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A8-8600P scores 2,464 against the Celeron N4120's 2,463 — a 0% lead for the A8-8600P.

Feature	A8-8600P	Celeron N4120
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3 GHz+15%	2.6 GHz
Base Clock	1.6 GHz+45%	1.1 GHz
L3 Cache	—	4 MB
L2 Cache	2048 kB	4 MB+100%
Process	28 nm	14 nm-50%
Architecture	Carrizo (2015−2018)	Gemini Lake Refresh (2019)
PassMark	2,464	2,463
Cinebench R23 Multi	3,160	—
Geekbench 6 Single	499	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,300	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-8600P uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron N4120 uses FCBGA1090 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A8-8600P	Celeron N4120
Socket	FP4	FCBGA1090
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-2133	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	12	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A8-8600P) / not specified (Celeron N4120). The A8-8600P includes integrated graphics (Radeon R6), while the Celeron N4120 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A8-8600P targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: A8-8600P rivals Core i5-5200U.