
A8-8600P

Core 2 Duo P8400
A8-8600P vs Core 2 Duo P8400 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A8-8600P vs Core 2 Duo P8400 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
A8-8600P vs Core 2 Duo P8400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A8-8600P
2015Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $59 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $209 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 37.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.4 vs 11.9 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $209 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 3W, a 1W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,464 vs 2,497).
Core 2 Duo P8400
2008Why buy it
- ✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A8-8600P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.9 vs 16.4 PassMark/$ ($209 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 3W vs 2W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while A8-8600P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is A8-8600P better than Core 2 Duo P8400?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A8-8600P vs Core 2 Duo P8400 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-8600P
The A8-8600P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,464 points. Launch price was $90.

Core 2 Duo P8400
The Core 2 Duo P8400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 July 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.26 GHz, with boost up to 2.26 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,497 points. Launch price was $209.
Processing Power
The A8-8600P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo P8400 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A8-8600P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the A8-8600P versus 2.26 GHz on the Core 2 Duo P8400 — a 28.1% clock advantage for the A8-8600P (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.26 GHz). The A8-8600P uses the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture (28 nm), while the Core 2 Duo P8400 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A8-8600P scores 2,464 against the Core 2 Duo P8400's 2,497 — a 1.3% lead for the Core 2 Duo P8400.
| Feature | A8-8600P | Core 2 Duo P8400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz+33% | 2.26 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.6 GHz | 2.26 GHz+41% |
| L3 Cache | — | 3 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 2048 kB | 3 MB+50% |
| Process | 28 nm-38% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Carrizo (2015−2018) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| PassMark | 2,464 | 2,497+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 3,160 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 499 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,300 | — |
Memory & Platform
The A8-8600P uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo P8400 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-2133 on the A8-8600P versus 1066 on the Core 2 Duo P8400 — the A8-8600P supports 100.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A8-8600P supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (A8-8600P) vs 0 (Core 2 Duo P8400) — the A8-8600P offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (A8-8600P) and GM45,GS45,PM45 (Core 2 Duo P8400).
| Feature | A8-8600P | Core 2 Duo P8400 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP4 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+173% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-2133+100% | 1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 12 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A8-8600P) vs true (Core 2 Duo P8400). The A8-8600P includes integrated graphics (Radeon R6), while the Core 2 Duo P8400 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A8-8600P targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: A8-8600P rivals Core i5-5200U; Core 2 Duo P8400 rivals Turion II Ultra M600.
| Feature | A8-8600P | Core 2 Duo P8400 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R6 | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | true |
| Target Use | Legacy Laptop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the A8-8600P was priced at $150, while the Core 2 Duo P8400 came in at $209. On launch pricing ($150 vs $209), A8-8600P was $59 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A8-8600P delivers 16.4 pts/$ vs 11.9 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo P8400 — making the A8-8600P the 31.6% better value option.
| Feature | A8-8600P | Core 2 Duo P8400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-28% | $209 |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.4+38% | 11.9 |
| Release Date | 2015 | 2008 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















