A8-8600P vs Core i7-4650U

A8-8600P vs Core i7-4650U Performance Spectrum

A8-8600P

4 / 4

2,464

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i7-4650U

2 / 4

2,463

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-8600P vs Core i7-4650U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-8600P vs Core i7-4650U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-8600P

2015

Why buy it

✅+0% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 2W instead of 512W, a 510W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R6, while Core i7-4650U needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Core i7-4650U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Core i7-4650U

2013

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,463 vs 2,464).
❌25500% higher power demand at 512W vs 2W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A8-8600P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A8-8600P better than Core i7-4650U?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-4650U is ahead with a 2.1% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, A8-8600P pulls ahead with 0% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A8-8600P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A8-8600P is the better buy right now. A8-8600P comes in at an unclear MSRP at $150 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i7-4650U is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 2.1% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (16.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A8-8600P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A8-8600P vs Core i7-4650U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-8600P

The A8-8600P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,464 points. Launch price was $90.

Core i7-4650U

The Core i7-4650U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell-ULT (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,463 points. Launch price was $454.

⚡

Processing Power

The A8-8600P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-4650U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A8-8600P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the A8-8600P versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i7-4650U — a 9.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-4650U (base: 1.6 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The A8-8600P uses the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i7-4650U uses Haswell-ULT (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A8-8600P scores 2,464 against the Core i7-4650U's 2,463 — a 0% lead for the A8-8600P.

Feature	A8-8600P	Core i7-4650U
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3 GHz	3.3 GHz+10%
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	1.7 GHz+6%
L3 Cache	—	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2048 kB+700%	256K (per core)
Process	28 nm	22 nm-21%
Architecture	Carrizo (2015−2018)	Haswell-ULT (2013)
PassMark	2,464	2,463
Cinebench R23 Multi	3,160	—
Geekbench 6 Single	499	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,300	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-8600P uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-4650U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A8-8600P	Core i7-4650U
Socket	FP4	FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-2133	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	12	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A8-8600P) / not specified (Core i7-4650U). The A8-8600P includes integrated graphics (Radeon R6), while the Core i7-4650U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A8-8600P targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: A8-8600P rivals Core i5-5200U.