Core i3-3250T
VS
Core i7-3687U

Core i3-3250T vs Core i7-3687U

Intel

Core i3-3250T

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Core i7-3687U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-3250T is positioned at rank 811 and the Core i7-3687U is on rank 654, so the Core i7-3687U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-3250T

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
16235%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
15341%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
11139%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3356%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2658%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2325%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1332%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1314%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1197%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1197%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1183%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1151%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1135%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1131%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1120%
#811
Core i3-3250T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $15
100%
#812
Core i5-5575R
MSRP: $265|Avg: $50
100%
#814
Core i3-3210
MSRP: $117|Avg: $25
99%
#815
Celeron G3900E
MSRP: $107|Avg: $35
99%
#816
Athlon II X3 435
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
98%
#817
Core i7-6822EQ
MSRP: $294|Avg: $190
98%
#818
Athlon II X4 645
MSRP: $126|Avg: $20
98%
#819
Core i5-7400
MSRP: $294|Avg: $70
97%
#820
Pentium E5800
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
97%
#821
Core i7-6820EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $344
97%
#822
A6-9500
MSRP: $101|Avg: $25
97%
#823
Pentium G2120T
MSRP: $87|Avg: $10
97%
#824
Athlon II X2 270
MSRP: $72|Avg: $15
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-3687U

#642
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
896%
#643
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
882%
#644
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
810%
#645
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
806%
#646
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
799%
#648
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
772%
#649
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
740%
#650
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
739%
#651
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
719%
#654
Core i7-3687U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#662
Athlon II P360
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
99%
#665
Athlon X2 QL-64
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
99%
#666
Core 3 N350
MSRP: $225|Avg: $220
98%
#668
FX-7500
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i7-3687U leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i3-3250T is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1.1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i3-3250TCore i7-3687U
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i3-3250TCore i7-3687U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-3250T and Core i7-3687U

Intel

Core i3-3250T

The Core i3-3250T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,650 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i7-3687U

The Core i7-3687U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,621 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-3250T and Core i7-3687U share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Core i3-3250T versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i7-3687U — a 9.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-3687U (base: 3 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). Both are built on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture using a 22 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i3-3250T scores 2,650 against the Core i7-3687U's 2,621 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i3-3250T. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-3250T vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-3687U.

FeatureCore i3-3250TCore i7-3687U
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3 GHz
3.3 GHz+10%
Base Clock
3 GHz+43%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
4 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
22 nm
22 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
2,650+1%
2,621
Geekbench 6 Single
640
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,240
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-3250T uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-3687U uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H61,B75,H77,Z77 (Core i3-3250T) and QM77,QS77 (Core i7-3687U).

FeatureCore i3-3250TCore i7-3687U
Socket
LGA1155
BGA1023
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i3-3250T) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-3687U). Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics 2500 (Core i3-3250T) and HD Graphics 4000 (Core i7-3687U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-3687U targets Enthusiast. Direct competitor: Core i7-3687U rivals Ryzen 7 3700U.

FeatureCore i3-3250TCore i7-3687U
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 2500
HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Enthusiast