Core i3-3250T
VS
Core i7-4510U

Core i3-3250T vs Core i7-4510U

Intel

Core i3-3250T

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Core i7-4510U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-3250T is positioned at rank 811 and the Core i7-4510U is on rank 66, so the Core i7-4510U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-3250T

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
16235%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
15341%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
11139%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3356%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2658%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2325%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1332%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1314%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1197%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1197%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1183%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1151%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1135%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1131%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1120%
#811
Core i3-3250T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $15
100%
#812
Core i5-5575R
MSRP: $265|Avg: $50
100%
#814
Core i3-3210
MSRP: $117|Avg: $25
99%
#815
Celeron G3900E
MSRP: $107|Avg: $35
99%
#816
Athlon II X3 435
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
98%
#817
Core i7-6822EQ
MSRP: $294|Avg: $190
98%
#818
Athlon II X4 645
MSRP: $126|Avg: $20
98%
#819
Core i5-7400
MSRP: $294|Avg: $70
97%
#820
Pentium E5800
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
97%
#821
Core i7-6820EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $344
97%
#822
A6-9500
MSRP: $101|Avg: $25
97%
#823
Pentium G2120T
MSRP: $87|Avg: $10
97%
#824
Athlon II X2 270
MSRP: $72|Avg: $15
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-4510U

#14
Ryzen 5 PRO 230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
100%
#15
Ryzen 5 220
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
95%
#18
Ryzen 5 8500G
MSRP: $179|Avg: $150
91%
#54
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
223%
#55
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
220%
#56
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
202%
#57
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
201%
#58
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
199%
#60
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
192%
#61
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
184%
#62
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
184%
#63
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
179%
#66
Core i7-4510U
MSRP: $393|Avg: N/A
100%
#69
Core 2 Quad Q9100
MSRP: $14|Avg: $14
98%
#75
Core i3-4030U
MSRP: $281|Avg: N/A
95%
#79
Atom D2500
MSRP: $42|Avg: N/A
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i7-4510U leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i3-3250T is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.6% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i3-3250TCore i7-4510U
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($15)
⚠️ Higher cost ($393)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Core i3-3250T stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 96% cheaper ($15 vs $393) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCore i3-3250TCore i7-4510U
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+2536%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($15)
⚠️ Higher cost ($393)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-3250T and Core i7-4510U

Intel

Core i3-3250T

The Core i3-3250T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,650 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i7-4510U

The Core i7-4510U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,634 points. Launch price was $393.

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-3250T and Core i7-4510U share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Core i3-3250T versus 3.1 GHz on the Core i7-4510U — a 3.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-4510U (base: 3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i3-3250T uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-4510U uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-3250T scores 2,650 against the Core i7-4510U's 2,634 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i3-3250T. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-3250T vs 4 MB on the Core i7-4510U.

FeatureCore i3-3250TCore i7-4510U
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3 GHz
3.1 GHz+3%
Base Clock
3 GHz+50%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
4 MB+33%
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
512 kB+100%
Process
22 nm
22 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
2,650
2,634
Geekbench 6 Single
880
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-3250T uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-4510U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. The Core i3-3250T supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i3-3250T) vs 12 (Core i7-4510U) — the Core i3-3250T offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H61,B75,H77,Z77 (Core i3-3250T) and SoC (Core i7-4510U).

FeatureCore i3-3250TCore i7-4510U
Socket
LGA1155
FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB+100%
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16+33%
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i3-3250T) / VT-x, EPT (Core i7-4510U). Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics 2500 (Core i3-3250T) and HD Graphics 4400 (Core i7-4510U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-4510U targets Ultrabook. Direct competitor: Core i7-4510U rivals A10-7300.

FeatureCore i3-3250TCore i7-4510U
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 2500
HD Graphics 4400
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, EPT
Target Use
Ultrabook
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i3-3250T launched at $138 MSRP, while the Core i7-4510U debuted at $393.

FeatureCore i3-3250TCore i7-4510U
MSRP
$138-65%
$393
Avg Price (30d)
$15
Release Date
2013
2014