Core i3-3250T vs Pro A12-8800B

CPU

GPU

Core i3-3250T

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3 GHz2013

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Pro A12-8800B

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2015

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Core i3-3250T vs Pro A12-8800B Performance Spectrum

Core i3-3250T

2 / 4

2,650

0.0%

Celeron N2810

Pentium Dual Core T2390

2,667

+0.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-3250T vs Pro A12-8800B FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-3250T vs Pro A12-8800B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-3250T

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $262 less on MSRP ($138 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
✅Delivers 188.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.2 vs 6.7 PassMark/$ ($138 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Pro A12-8800B across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,650 vs 2,667).
❌1650% higher power demand at 35W vs 2W.

Pro A12-8800B

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 2W instead of 35W, a 33W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.7 vs 19.2 PassMark/$ ($400 MSRP vs $138 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Pro A12-8800B better than Core i3-3250T?

Yes. Pro A12-8800B is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pro A12-8800B is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pro A12-8800B is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pro A12-8800B is still the much better call for a fresh build. Pro A12-8800B comes in 189.9% more expensive on MSRP at $400 MSRP versus $138 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-3250T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2013 platform. Even with 188.0% better value on paper (19.2 vs 6.7 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1155.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pro A12-8800B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-3250T vs Pro A12-8800B Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-3250T

The Core i3-3250T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,650 points. Launch price was $69.

Pro A12-8800B

The Pro A12-8800B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 June 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3/DDR3L-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,667 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-3250T packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Pro A12-8800B offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Pro A12-8800B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Core i3-3250T versus 3.4 GHz on the Pro A12-8800B — a 12.5% clock advantage for the Pro A12-8800B (base: 3 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i3-3250T uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Pro A12-8800B uses Carrizo (2015−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-3250T scores 2,650 against the Pro A12-8800B's 2,667 — a 0.6% lead for the Pro A12-8800B.

Feature	Core i3-3250T	Pro A12-8800B
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3 GHz	3.4 GHz+13%
Base Clock	3 GHz+43%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	2048 kB+700%
Process	22 nm-21%	28 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Carrizo (2015−2018)
PassMark	2,650	2,667
Geekbench 6 Single	—	528
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	1,144

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-3250T uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pro A12-8800B uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-3250T versus DDR3-2133 on the Pro A12-8800B — the Pro A12-8800B supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Pro A12-8800B supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H61,B75,H77,Z77 (Core i3-3250T) and Socket FP4 (Pro A12-8800B).

Feature	Core i3-3250T	Pro A12-8800B
Socket	LGA1155	FP4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	DDR3-2133+33%
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	64 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i3-3250T) / AMD-V (Pro A12-8800B). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics 2500 (Core i3-3250T) and Radeon R7 Graphics (Pro A12-8800B) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU.

Feature	Core i3-3250T	Pro A12-8800B
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics 2500	Radeon R7 Graphics
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	AMD-V

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-3250T was priced at $138, while the Pro A12-8800B came in at $400. On launch pricing ($138 vs $400), Core i3-3250T was $262 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-3250T delivers 19.2 pts/$ vs 6.7 pts/$ for the Pro A12-8800B — making the Core i3-3250T the 96.9% better value option.

Feature	Core i3-3250T	Pro A12-8800B
MSRP	$138-66%	$400
Performance per Dollar	19.2+187%	6.7
Release Date	2013	2015

Search Core i3-3250T on Amazon

Search Pro A12-8800B on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.